{"id":1063445,"date":"2013-02-17T02:53:38","date_gmt":"2013-02-17T07:53:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.longevitymedicine.tv\/cirm-board-member-prieto-critiques-the-iom-stem-cell-report\/"},"modified":"2024-08-17T20:29:35","modified_gmt":"2024-08-18T00:29:35","slug":"cirm-board-member-prieto-critiques-the-iom-stem-cell-report-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/cirm-board-member-prieto-critiques-the-iom-stem-cell-report-2.php","title":{"rendered":"CIRM Board Member Prieto Critiques the IOM Stem Cell Report"},"content":{"rendered":"

Francisco Prieto<\/b>, a member of the
governing board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency, is
expressing some additional dissatisfaction with the blue-ribbon
Institute of Medicine<\/b> (IOM) report for which the agency paid $700,000.<\/p>

<\/div>
The report recommended sweeping changes<\/a>
at the agency, including creation of a new majority of independent
members on the board. The IOM cited problems arising from the
built-in conflicts of interest on the board that were created by
Proposition 71<\/b>, which created in the agency in 2004. Prieto's email refers to Bob Klein, <\/b>who <\/b>is a real estate investor and attorney. Klein
oversaw the drafting of the 10,000-word ballot measure(writing much
of it himself), ran its $35 million ballot campaign and became the
first chairman of the agency. The qualifications for chairman were written into the proposition and seemed to uniquely apply to Klein.  Prieto is a Sacramento physician who
was appointed to the board as patient advocate.<\/div>
<\/div>
.Here is the text of Prieto's comments.
His earlier comments can be found here<\/a>.<\/div>

“A few more words on independence,
and the IOM.  I think Bob Klein drafted the proposition (and
remember, all of this was spelled out there – readily available to
the voters and whatever news sources they were depending on for
information) deliberately to engage patient advocates. I think  he
knew that those of us who have been active in disease advocacy have a
passion around the issue of advancing research that someone without
that background would be unlikely to have. I’m not sure exactly
what the IOM had in mind when they called for more 'independent'
members of the board, since they very unfortunately did not bother to
interview the patient advocates on the ICOC<\/b>(the governing board). I
don’t know what their reason for this was, if there was one, but
they only circulated a (in my view) frankly inadequate questionnaire,
and interviewed a small handful of people. I think this was a major
flaw in their process and gave them a very limited view of our role.
It is hard for me to imagine who they might have in mind, if not
people who had been involved with some existing advocacy
organization. I think there are very few if any patient advocates who
aren’t working with some group – the only ones I might imagine
would be some independently wealthy person able to start a foundation
or research institute on their own.  With all due respect to
Bill Gates<\/b> and the great work his foundation is doing with malaria
and HIV, I have written before that I think it would be absolutely
wrong and anti-democratic to create any public board or commission
that only millionaires could sit on.”<\/p><\/blockquote>

An anonymous comment was also posted
concerning the IOM report and conflicts of interest. It dealt briefly
with the issue and difficulty of managing conflicts. The comment can be found at the end of this item<\/a>.<\/div>
<\/div>

Source:
http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/blogspot\/uqpFc\/~3\/Y_gHaql_zgg\/cirm-board-member-prieto-critiques-iom.html<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Francisco Prieto, a member of thegoverning board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency, isexpressing some additional dissatisfaction with the blue-ribbonInstitute of Medicine (IOM) report for which the agency paid $700,000.The report recommended sweeping changesat the agency, including creation … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[25,1246878],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1063445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stem-cell-therapy","category-stem-cells"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063445"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1063445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063445\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1063445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1063445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1063445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}