Cross-examination of the Prosecution\u2019s witnesses continued yesterday in the seventh day of the trial of former University student George Huguely, as expert witnesses described their analysis of former University student Yeardley Love\u2019s brain. Huguely is charged with the murder of Love, his former girlfriend. <\/p>\n
Dr. Christine Fuller, a neuropathology Prof. at Virginia Commonwealth University, conducted the initial study of Love\u2019s brain, after the initial autopsy. Fuller identified contusions and hemorrhaging in the space surrounding the surface of the brain, which indicates blunt force trauma. <\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s trauma. Period,\u201d Fuller said. \u201cIt isn\u2019t anything else.\u201d <\/p>\n
Fuller said these injuries can be the results of a fall, but usually not one from ground level. She said being punched severely, particularly while against a flat surface, could result in similar contusions. <\/p>\n
Fuller found Love\u2019s injuries in the brain stem, the part of the brain which controls basic functions such as consciousness, respiration and circulation, she said. The location of the hemmorhaging in the brain stem, toward the back and side, make the cause of the injury clear, she added. <\/p>\n
Fuller explained these contusions in the cerebral hemispheres might cause headaches or small strokes if the patient survived, but the hemorrhaging and contusions she identified in another region of the brain have more severe possible consequences. <\/p>\n
This damage \u201ccould potentially cause sudden death,\u201d or death within several hours, Fuller said. She later testified during cross-examination she believes Love died two hours after receiving these injuries. <\/p>\n
Fuller said the type of hemhorraging found in Love\u2019s brain is not associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which is the defense\u2019s claim. <\/p>\n
Fuller told the court she agreed with the report of Dr. Beatriz Lopes, a pathology professor at the Medical School who conducted a second analysis of Love\u2019s brain. <\/p>\n
Lopes, who also testified as an expert yesterday, conducted a test Fuller did not have access to \u2014 the Beta amyloid precursor protein stain, a process which shows a better time of injury than other methods, she said. <\/p>\n
The prosecution re-questioned medical examiner Bill Gormley who testified Monday. Gormley ruled out alcohol and amphetamines for the cause of Love\u2019s death, citing <\/p>\n
Love\u2019s 0.14 blood alcohol content and 0.05 for amphetamines. Gormley said the cause of death was \u201cmost likely the cardiac arrest\u201d with \u201ccontusions to the head\u201d serving as the primary cause. <\/p>\n
A slew of forensic specialists took the witness stand for the remainder of the trial. <\/p>\n
Curt Harper, a forensic toxicologist in the University\u2019s Department of Forensic Science said although amphetamines such as Adderrol can eventually lead to death, Love exhibited a blood level ten times less than the lethal dose. <\/p>\n
The prosecution also brought Jenny Mouer, a latent print expert who explained tests she had performed on Love\u2019s bedroom door and a crushed Natural Light beer can. The white door was on display in the courtroom and visibly showed traces of black powder, which had been used to perform the fingerprint tests. Mouer said none of the prints on the door and the beer-can were usable. \u201cThere were no latent prints of value for identification purposes,\u201d she said. <\/p>\n
The Commonwealth\u2019s Attorney Chappman presented his next witness, Marjorie Harris, with photographic images of the crime scene. Though the pictures were not explicitly shown to the audience, they were translucent and could be identified from the back as images of Love and a bed covered in red stains. <\/p>\n
Harris, an expert of blood stain patterns, classified the majority of the stains on the comforter, bed-skirt and pillow as transfer stains, which indicate the transfer of blood from a blood-bearing source to another source. <\/p>\n
When Chappman presented Harris with a picture of a blood-stained pillow, he inquired whether it was possible for Harris to determine whether the image was indicative of \u201cfabric moving over a person or a person moving over fabric,\u201d but Harris said it was impossible to speculate. <\/p>\n
\u201cIt\u2019s much more difficult working with just photographs,\u201d Harris said. <\/p>\n
DNA specialist Angie Rainey provided the final testimony in day seven of the Huguely trial and explained more than 30 pieces of evidence. <\/p>\n
The evidence included Love\u2019s left and right fingernail clippings, her underwear, swabs from her bedroom floor, her pillow case, scrapings from both of Huguely\u2019s hands, items of clothing found in Huguely\u2019s apartments and swabs taken from the bath-mats, shower curtains and towels in Huguely\u2019s and Love\u2019s apartments. <\/p>\n
Rainey said the blood found under Love\u2019s fingernails belonged to Love and the scrapings taken from Huguely\u2019s hands placed both Love and Huguely at the crime-scene. <\/p>\n
The trial resumes today at 9 a.m. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Read more: Cross-examination of the Prosecution\u2019s witnesses continued yesterday in the seventh day of the trial of former University student George Huguely, as expert witnesses described their analysis of former University student Yeardley Love\u2019s brain. Huguely is charged with the murder of Love, his former girlfriend Continue reading
\nNeurology Prof. says force caused Love\u2019s initial brain damage, hemorrhaging<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"