{"id":1038994,"date":"2012-03-08T13:49:46","date_gmt":"2012-03-08T13:49:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.immortalitymedicine.tv\/uncategorized\/uspstf-updating-brca-testing-recommendations-for-asymptomatic-women-accepting-public-input.php"},"modified":"2024-08-17T16:23:07","modified_gmt":"2024-08-17T20:23:07","slug":"uspstf-updating-brca-testing-recommendations-for-asymptomatic-women-accepting-public-input","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/pharmacogenomics\/uspstf-updating-brca-testing-recommendations-for-asymptomatic-women-accepting-public-input.php","title":{"rendered":"USPSTF Updating BRCA Testing Recommendations for Asymptomatic Women; Accepting Public Input"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    By Turna Ray  <\/p>\n<p>    The US Preventative Services Task Force is    seeking public comments on its systematic evidence review plan    to assess under what conditions genetically testing    asymptomatic women for their risk of developing hereditary    breast and ovarian cancer has a positive impact on their    health.  <\/p>\n<p>    The USPSTF is in the process of updating its recommendation on BRCA    mutation testing to gauge breast and ovarian cancer    susceptibility. As part of that larger effort, it is calling    for stakeholder input as it gathers evidence to answer specific    questions on the risks and benefits of genetically testing    asymptomatic women, who have a family history of breast and    ovarian cancer but who themselves don't have these diseases.  <\/p>\n<p>    The USPSTF's most recent recommendations on BRCA testing, issued in    2005, advise doctors against giving their patients routine    referrals for genetic counseling or BRCA testing unless their    family history suggests they might harbor mutations in tumor    suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. The group recommends that if    women have a family history that places them at increased risk    for having these gene mutations, then doctors should refer them    for genetic counseling and \"evaluation for BRCA testing.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    According to the National Cancer Institute, among Caucasian    women in the US, between 5 percent and 10 percent of breast    cancer patients and between 10 percent and 15 percent of    ovarian cancer patients have BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The    risk of having these mutations is higher in women of Ashkenazi    Jewish descent and those of Norwegian, Dutch, and Icelandic    ethnicities. There is, however, limited data on how frequent    these mutations occur among prevalent ethnic groups in the US,    including African Americans, Hispanics, and Asian Americans.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Although there currently are no standardized referral    criteria, women with an increased-risk family history should be    considered for genetic counseling to further evaluate their    potential risks,\" the USPSTF notes in its 2005 recommendations.    \"Computational tools are available to predict the risk for    clinically important BRCA mutations (that is, BRCA mutations    associated with the presence of breast cancer, ovarian cancer,    or both), but these tools have not been verified in the general    population.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    According to the USPSTF's proposal for comment, the group is    seeking to gather evidence on whether BRCA testing reduces the    incidence of breast and ovarian cancer, as well keeps women    alive longer. Additionally, the USPSTF is seeking to gather    data on how accurate physicians' risk assessment methods are    for selecting which patients should receive BRCA mutation    testing; what the benefits are of genetic counseling patients    ahead of testing; and what the adverse effects of testing and    counseling are.  <\/p>\n<p>    USPSTF recommendations are carefully considered by private    payors and factored into their coverage determinations for BRCA    genetic testing. For example, Aetna in its clinical policy for BRCA testing cites the    2005 USPSTF recommendations to note that clinical models    currently employed in medical practice for determining when    women should receive genetic testing are based on women who    already have cancer, and that the applicability of these models    to screen asymptomatic or cancer-free women for BRCA testing is    unknown.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Available evidence suggests that current models for predicting    BRCA mutation may tend to overestimate risk when family history    is adequate and underestimate risk when family history is    limited,\" Aetna states in the clinical policy. \"Researchers    have speculated that, in young women with limited family    structures (i.e., fewer than two women who survived past age 45    in either parental lineage), the genetic models that are used    to predict carrier status would underestimate the prevalence of    BRCA mutations.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    If USPSTF broadens its recommendations to include the    asymptomatic population, it would certainly have a positive    impact on Myriad Genetics' revenues for the BRACAnalysis test,    the only commercially available genetic test that assesses BRCA    mutations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer    susceptibility.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read more:<br \/>\n<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.genomeweb.com\/mdx\/uspstf-updating-brca-testing-recommendations-asymptomatic-women-accepting-public\" title=\"USPSTF Updating BRCA Testing Recommendations for Asymptomatic Women; Accepting Public Input\" rel=\"noopener\">USPSTF Updating BRCA Testing Recommendations for Asymptomatic Women; Accepting Public Input<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Turna Ray The US Preventative Services Task Force is seeking public comments on its systematic evidence review plan to assess under what conditions genetically testing asymptomatic women for their risk of developing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer has a positive impact on their health.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/pharmacogenomics\/uspstf-updating-brca-testing-recommendations-for-asymptomatic-women-accepting-public-input.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1246862],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1038994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pharmacogenomics"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038994"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1038994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1038994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1038994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1038994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1038994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}