{"id":1030463,"date":"2011-01-22T18:12:29","date_gmt":"2011-01-22T18:12:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.immortalitymedicine.tv\/anonymity-and-secrecy-options-of-recipient-couples-and-donors-and-ethnic-origin-influence-in-three-types-of-oocyte-donation\/"},"modified":"2024-08-17T14:58:24","modified_gmt":"2024-08-17T18:58:24","slug":"anonymity-and-secrecy-options-of-recipient-couples-and-donors-and-ethnic-origin-influence-in-three-types-of-oocyte-donation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/human-reproduction\/anonymity-and-secrecy-options-of-recipient-couples-and-donors-and-ethnic-origin-influence-in-three-types-of-oocyte-donation.php","title":{"rendered":"Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND<\/p>\n<p>This study compares recipient couples' and donors' motivations towards the type of donation and attitudes concerning secrecy or disclosure of the mode of conception in three oocyte donation groups: couples and their donor for a known donation, couples and their donor for a permuted anonymous donation (known-anonymous) and couples without a donor, on a waiting list for a donation (anonymous).<\/p>\n<p>METHODS<\/p>\n<p>Data collected by two psychologists through semi-structured interviews of 135 recipient couples and 90 donors before oocyte donation were analysed retrospectively.<\/p>\n<p>RESULTS<\/p>\n<p>In known donation (42 couples), donors were preferentially family members with a blood tie (54.7%). Choosing their donor seemed mainly for the couple's reassurance rather than to access the child's origins as 50% wanted secrecy. On the other hand, in known-anonymous donation (48 couples), donors were more frequently chosen among friends (41.6%; <I>P<\/I> = 0.038). These couples were either open to disclosure (45.8%; <I>P<\/I>= 0.002) or remained hesitant (39.6%). In anonymous donation (45 couples), 49% chose not to seek a donor mostly in order to maintain secrecy towards the child (77.3%). Among the 51% who sought but could not find a donor, only 30.4% wanted secrecy. Recipients from North Africa and from Europe preferred anonymous or known-anonymous donation (83.3 and 75.6%), whereas sub-Saharan Africans opted more often for known donation (63%; <I>P &lt;<\/I>0.001). Among Europeans (90 couples), 50% were in favour of disclosure compared with only 8.9% of recipients from North or sub-Saharan Africa (45 couples; <I>P<\/I>&lt; 0.001).<\/p>\n<p>CONCLUSIONS<\/p>\n<p>A diversity of attitudes and cultural differences exist among recipient couples and donors regarding oocyte donation; this pleads for maintaining access to different types of oocyte donation as well as for psychological counselling prior to treatment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BACKGROUND This study compares recipient couples' and donors' motivations towards the type of donation and attitudes concerning secrecy or disclosure of the mode of conception in three oocyte donation groups: couples and their donor for a known donation, couples and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/human-reproduction\/anonymity-and-secrecy-options-of-recipient-couples-and-donors-and-ethnic-origin-influence-in-three-types-of-oocyte-donation.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1246857],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1030463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-human-reproduction"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1030463"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1030463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1030463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1030463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1030463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1030463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}