{"id":1028278,"date":"2024-04-16T02:38:09","date_gmt":"2024-04-16T06:38:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/nasa-needs-a-cheaper-faster-way-to-bring-mars-dirt-back-to-earth-the-verge.php"},"modified":"2024-04-16T02:38:09","modified_gmt":"2024-04-16T06:38:09","slug":"nasa-needs-a-cheaper-faster-way-to-bring-mars-dirt-back-to-earth-the-verge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/mars\/nasa-needs-a-cheaper-faster-way-to-bring-mars-dirt-back-to-earth-the-verge.php","title":{"rendered":"NASA needs a cheaper, faster way to bring Mars dirt back to Earth &#8211; The Verge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Budget constraints have NASA looking for a faster and cheaper    method to bring samples from Mars surface back to Earth. In a        teleconference on Monday, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson    said that an independent review concluded that the agencys    current plan to bring the first samples collected by the Mars    rover Perseverance could cost up to $11 billion and would    likely not be achievable until 2040. The fiscal 2025 budget for    the space agency, as well as additional anticipated budget    cuts, are behind how slowly the current plan is being    executed.  <\/p>\n<p>    That is unacceptable to wait that long, Nelson said about the    mission to return samples of dust and rocks from Mars to Earth.    Its the decade of the 2040s that were going to be landing    astronauts on Mars.  <\/p>\n<p>    NASA is planning to solicit ideas from its various centers and    the Jet Propulsion    Laboratory for a quicker, cheaper return mission. Nelson    said the agency is aiming for a budget of under $7 billion and    is hoping to bring the samples back in the 2030s.  <\/p>\n<p>    The     independent review, conducted last September, raised    numerous concerns over the feasibility of NASAs Mars Sample    Return Mission. NASA had originally estimated that the return    missions launch would take place in 2027 or 2028, but the    independent review concluded that this would be impossible due    to technical issues, risks, and performance-to-date.   <\/p>\n<p>    In an X post on Monday, SpaceX founder Elon Musk wrote that the    company will be responding to NASAs solicitation for    alternatives and that the companys Starship rocket has the    potential to return serious tonnage in less than five years.  <\/p>\n<p>    Starship has run into its own delays and challenges. The most    recent launch of a prototype in March was successful, but    SpaceX     lost contact with the rocket just as it reentered the    Earths atmosphere.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2024\/4\/15\/24131341\/nasa-mars-sample-return-mission-elon-musk-space-x\" title=\"NASA needs a cheaper, faster way to bring Mars dirt back to Earth - The Verge\">NASA needs a cheaper, faster way to bring Mars dirt back to Earth - The Verge<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Budget constraints have NASA looking for a faster and cheaper method to bring samples from Mars surface back to Earth. In a teleconference on Monday, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said that an independent review concluded that the agencys current plan to bring the first samples collected by the Mars rover Perseverance could cost up to $11 billion and would likely not be achievable until 2040. The fiscal 2025 budget for the space agency, as well as additional anticipated budget cuts, are behind how slowly the current plan is being executed.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/mars\/nasa-needs-a-cheaper-faster-way-to-bring-mars-dirt-back-to-earth-the-verge.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[807137],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1028278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mars"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1028278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1028278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1028278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1028278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1028278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1028278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}