World Health Organization (WHO). https:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/fact-sheets\/detail\/infertility<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n de los Santos, M. J. et al. ESHRE guideline group on good practice in IVF labs. Hum. Reprod. 31, 130 (2015).<\/p>\n Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G. & Devroey, P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Hum. Reprod. Update 14, 605621 (2008).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Kadi, S. & Wiesing, U. The German IVF Register as an instrument to document assisted reproductive technologies. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 76, 680684 (2019).<\/p>\n Glujovsky, D., Farquhar, C., Quinteiro Retamar, A. M., Alvarez Sedo, C. R. & Blake, D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 30, CD002118 (2016).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Fordham, D. E. et al. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity? Hum. Reprod. 37, 22752290 (2022).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n De Croo, I., Van der Elst, J., Everaert, K., De Sutter, P. & Dhont, M. Fertilization, pregnancy and embryo implantation rates after ICSI with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa. Hum. Reprod. 13, 18931897 (1998).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Bashiri, A., Halper, K. I. & Orvieto, R. Recurrent implantation failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 16, 118 (2018).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Cimadomo, D., Craciunas, L., Vermeulen, N., Vomstein, K. & Toth, B. Definition, diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure: an international survey of clinicians and embryologists. Hum. Reprod. 36, 305317 (2021).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Cohen, J. The efficiency and efficacy of IVF and GIFT. Hum. Reprod. 6, 613618 (1991).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Simon, A. & Laufer, N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF). J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 29, 12271239 (2012).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Weissman, A. et al. Zygote intrafallopian transfer among patients with repeated implantation failure. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 120, 7073 (2013).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Busnelli, A., Somigliana, E., Cirillo, F., Baggiani, A. & Levi-Setti, P. E. Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 11, 1747 (2021).<\/p>\n ADS CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Tournaye, H. et al. Tubal transfer: a forgotten ART? Hum. Reprod. 11, 19871990 (1996).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Ruiz-Alonso, M. et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 100, 818824 (2013).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Eytan, O., Elad, D., Zaretsky, U. & Jaffa, A. J. A glance into the uterus during in vitro simulation on embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 19, 562569 (2004).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Medina-Snchez, M. et al. Medical microbots need better imaging and control. Nature 545, 406408 (2017).<\/p>\n ADS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Schwarz, L. et al. A rotating spiral micromotor for noninvasive zygote transfer. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000843 (2020).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Rivkin, B. et al. Electronically integrated microcatheters based on self-assembling polymer films. Sci. Adv. 7, eabl5408 (2021).<\/p>\n ADS CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Matsuda, T. & Kawahara, D. Electrospinning fabrication of high-trackable catheter tip with gradually graded or gradient flexibility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 87, 3541 (2008).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Jeon, S. et al. A magnetically controlled soft microrobot steering a guidewire in a three-dimensional phantom vascular network. Soft Robot. 6, 5468 (2019).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Piskarev, Y. et al. A variable stiffness magnetic catheter made of a conductive phase-change polymer for minimally invasive surgery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2107662 (2022).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Mattmann, M. et al. Thermoset shape memory polymer variable stiffness 4D robotic catheters. Adv. Sci. 9, 2103277 (2022).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Misra, S., Reed, K. B., Schafer, B. W., Ramesh, K. T. & Okamura, A. M. Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue. Int. J. Rob. Res. 29, 16401660 (2010).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Goudu, S. R. et al. Biodegradable untethered magnetic hydrogel milli-grippers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2004975 (2020).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Breger, J. C. et al. Self-folding thermo-magnetically responsive soft microgrippers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 33983405 (2015).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Rajabasadi, F., Schwarz, L., Medina-Snchez, M. & Schmidt, O. G. 3D and 4D lithography of untethered microrobots. Prog. Mater. Sci. 120, 100808 (2021).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Rajabasadi, F. et al. Multifunctional 4D-printed sperm-hybrid microcarriers for assisted reproduction. Adv. Mater. 34, 2204257 (2022).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Aziz, A., Holthof, J., Meyer, S., Schmidt, O. G. & Medina-Snchez, M. Dual ultrasound and photoacoustic tracking of magnetically driven micromotors: from in vitro to in vivo. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2101077 (2021).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Simerly, C. R. et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) with baboons generate live offspring: a nonhuman primate model for ART and reproductive sciences. Reprod. Sci. 17, 917930 (2010).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Kadiri, V. M. et al. Light- and magnetically actuated FePt microswimmers. Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 74 (2021).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n FDA. Biological evaluation of medical devices. http:\/\/www.fda.gov\/regulatory-information\/search-fda-guidance-documents\/use-international-standard-iso-10993-1-biological-evaluation-medical-devices-part-1-evaluation-and<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n Ceylan, H. et al. 3D-printed biodegradable microswimmer for theranostic cargo delivery and release. ACS Nano 13, 33533362 (2019).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Giltinan, J., Sridhar, V., Bozuyuk, U., Sheehan, D. & Sitti, M. 3D microprinting of iron platinum nanoparticlebased magnetic mobile microrobots. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3, 2000204 (2021).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Jessel, N. et al. Bioactive coatings based on a polyelectrolyte multilayer architecture functionalized by embedded proteins. Adv. Mater. 24, 3341 (2003).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Qiu, F. et al. Magnetic helical microswimmers functionalized with lipoplexes for targeted gene delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 16661671 (2015).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Wu, Z. et al. A microrobotic system guided by photoacoustic computed tomography for targeted navigation in intestines in vivo. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax0613 (2019).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Yasa, I. C., Ceylan, H., Bozuyuk, U., Wild, A. M. & Sitti, M. Elucidating the interaction dynamics between microswimmer body and immune system for medical microrobots. Sci. Robot. 5, eaaz3867 (2020).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Zhang, H., Li, Z., Wu, Z. & He, Q. Cancer cell membrane-camouflaged micromotor. Adv. Ther. 2, 1900096 (2019).<\/p>\n ADS CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Cabanach, P. et al. Zwitterionic 3Dprinted nonimmunogenic stealth microrobots. Adv. Mater. 32, 2003013 (2020).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Wu, Z. et al. A swarm of slippery micropropellers penetrates the vitreous body of the eye. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4388 (2018).<\/p>\n ADS CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Venugopalan, P. L., Jain, S., Shivashankar, S. & Ghosh, A. Single coating of zinc ferrite renders magnetic nanomotors therapeutic and stable against agglomeration. Nanoscale 10, 23272332 (2018).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Medina-Snchez, M., Magdanz, V., Guix, M., Fomin, V. M. & Schmidt, O. G. Swimming microrobots: soft, reconfigurable, and smart. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707228 (2018).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Tipnis, N. P. & Burgess, D. J. Sterilization of implantable polymer-based medical devices: A review. Int. J. Pharm. 544, 455460 (2018).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Xu, H. et al. Sperm-hybrid micromotor for targeted drug delivery. ACS Nano 12, 327337 (2018).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Medina-Snchez, M., Schwarz, L., Meyer, A. K., Hebenstreit, F. & Schmidt, O. G. Cellular cargo delivery: toward assisted fertilization by sperm-carrying micromotors. Nano Lett. 16, 555561 (2016).<\/p>\n ADS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Xu, H., Medina-Snchez, M., Maitz, M. F., Werner, C. & Schmidt, O. G. Sperm micromotors for cargo delivery through flowing blood. ACS Nano 14, 29822993 (2020).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Diemer, J., Hahn, J., Goldenbogen, B., Mller, K. & Klipp, E. Sperm migration in the genital tract-In silico experiments identify key factors for reproductive success. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, 117 (2021).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Herman, I. P. in Physics of the Human Body Ch. 7 (Springer, 2016).<\/p>\n Aziz, A. et al. Medical imaging of microrobots: toward in vivo applications. ACS Nano 14, 1086510893 (2020).<\/p>\n CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Aziz, A., Medina-Snchez, M., Claussen, J. & Schmidt, O. G. Real-time optoacoustic tracking of single moving micro-objects in deep phantom and ex vivo tissues. Nano Lett. 19, 66126620 (2019).<\/p>\n ADS CAS Google Scholar <\/p>\n Emanuel, A. L. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion in humans. Microcirculation 27, e12588 (2020).<\/p>\n Google Scholar <\/p>\n Shi, C. et al. Application of a sub-0.1-mm3 implantable mote for in vivo real-time wireless temperature sensing. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf6312 (2021).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n See the original post here: <\/p>\n Medical microrobots in reproductive medicine from the bench to the ... - Nature.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" World Health Organization (WHO). https:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/fact-sheets\/detail\/infertility<\/a> (2020). de los Santos, M. Continue reading