...1020...2829303132...4050...


Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s


Barron’s
Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore's Law
Barron’s
The notion of the End of Moore's Law is debated Intel refutes it but it's prompting lots of new ideas in chips. One approach is new chip designs, such as Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google's Tensor Processing Unit, a custom chip, something I explored in

Continue reading here:

Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s

What is Moore’s Law? – Definition from WhatIs.com

The original Moore’s Law derives from a speech given by Gordon Moore, later a founder of Intel, in 1965, in which he observed that the number of microcomponents that could be placed in an integrated circuit (microchip) of the lowest manufacturing cost was doubling every year and that this trend would likely continue into the future. As this observation and prediction began to be frequently cited, it became known as Moore’s Law. In later years, the Law was occasionally reformulated to mean that rate. The pace of change having slowed down a bit over the past few years, the definition has changed (with Gordon Moore’s approval) to reflect that the doubling occurs only every 18 months.

Continue reading here:

What is Moore’s Law? – Definition from WhatIs.com

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

In BriefTwo new semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconiumdiselenide have been observed to have similar traits to silicon,and may soon be the materials used to make smaller, more powerfultransistors. Hafnium Diselenide And Zirconium Diselenide

Silicon may no longer be the go-to material used in electronics, if two recently discovered materials are implemented. Electrical engineers at Stanfordrecently observed that two semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide, two forms of the same inorganic compound share similar qualities with silicon, but outperformed the material in other aspects.

A studypublished in the journal Science Advances explains the finding. Co-authored by Eric Pop, an associate professor of electrical engineering, with post-doctoral scholar Michal Mleczko, the report places the biggest emphasis on how all three materials cause rust.

Its the same kind of rust thats usually deemed harmful to metals and other materials, but within the context of electronics and circuitry, its actually a good thing: when silicon is exposed to oxygen, it rusts and becomes an insulator for circuitry, protecting it from harm. Other materials can be used to achieve the same effect, but they require additional work and layers of insulation, making silicon the preferred material to use.

Hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenideboth rust in a similar way to silicon, but their benefits go beyond this. Theyre able to form what are known as high-k insulators, which ultimately require less power than silicon and silicon oxide insulators.

The Stanford engineers also discovered the diselenides can be shrunk down to about three atoms thick; silicon cannot do the same and still be usable.

Engineers have been unable to make silicon transistors thinner than about five nanometers, before the material properties begin to change in undesirable ways, said Pop.

Theres also how the new semiconductor materials deal with the band gap, the range of energy needed to turn a transistor on. If the range of energy for a material is too low, it could cause the circuits to leak; too high, and the circuit then has too much energy to work with, becoming inefficient. The diselenides meet this requirement perfectly. Taking all of their benefits into account, they can be used to make transistors nearly 10 times smaller than whats used today.

This almost perfectly supports Moores Law, which states that transistors will continue to become smaller, more powerful, and more cost-effective at a consistent pace.

While hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide do everything silicon can and more, Pop states that its unlikely silicon will be replaced completely; theres more to study before future electronics see any changes.

To start, theres how the diselenide circuits will interact with transistors; These connections have always proved a challenge for any new semiconductor, and the difficulty becomes greater as we shrink circuits to the atomic scale, Mleczko said. The oxidization of the materials also needs to be improved to ensure the circuits and insulators are long-lasting and maintain their thin size.

As exciting as the finding may be, itll be quite some time before theyre used in complex circuits and complete, working systems. Until then, people can looking forward to owning devices with longer battery lives, which is one of the more immediate benefits that could come, if the new semiconductors are utilized.

Theres more research to do, but a new path to thinner, smaller circuits and more energy-efficient electronics is within reach, Pop said.

Read the original:

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

What is Moore’s Law? Webopedia Definition

Main TERM M

By Vangie Beal

(n.) Moore’s Law is the observation made in 1965 by Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, that the number of transistors per square inch on integrated circuits had doubled every year since the integrated circuit was invented. Moore predicted that this trend would continue for the foreseeable future. In subsequent years, the pace slowed down a bit, but data density has doubled approximately every 18 months, and this is the current definition of Moore’s Law, which Moore himself has blessed. Most experts, including Moore himself, expect Moore’s Law to hold true until 2020-2025.

TECH RESOURCES FROM OUR PARTNERS

Stay up to date on the latest developments in Internet terminology with a free weekly newsletter from Webopedia. Join to subscribe now.

Original post:

What is Moore’s Law? Webopedia Definition

GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore has said he doesn’t believe Obama is a natural-born citizen – CNN

Moore, who started questioning the legitimacy of Obama’s citizenship back in 2008, last year told a meeting of the Constitution Party that he personally did not believe Obama was a natural-born citizen.

“My personal belief is that he wasn’t, but that’s probably over and done in a few days, unless we get something else to come along,” he added.

Moore finished ahead of Strange in last week’s Republican primary, with 39% of the vote. The runoff election is set for September 26.

Moore’s campaign declined to make him available for interview and did not respond to follow-up emails about the details of this story.

Moore has made headlines for years by publicly championing hard-right causes. Last May, the state Court of the Judiciary suspended Moore as chief justice over his refusal to comply with the US Supreme Court’s decision striking down same-sex marriage bans nationwide. Over a decade prior, Moore was removed as chief justice for defying a court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the grounds of the Alabama Supreme Court.

“I don’t see any reason a candidate who has such a serious question would not come forward with the truth about where he was born, Moore said in December of that year.

“Obama has the answer,” Moore added. “He knows where he was born. If he tells something that’s untrue that’s another matter. It’s not an Obama issue, it’s an American issue. It’s about the Constitution of the United States.”

In March 2009, Moore spoke at length with conservative Internet radio show host Andrew Shea King about the birther issue.

“Now, I haven’t seen one thing in the press about this, and yet the President of the United States will not produce his birth certificate,” Moore said. “They produced a certificate of live birth from Hawaii that says he’s got the birth certificate, but nobody can see that birth certificate. My son had to show his birth certificate to get his driver’s permit to the county courthouse. He had to show his birth certificate to get on the little league team. My other son that’s in AIT [Advanced Individual Training] right now, before he went to basic training, he had to produce his birth certificate. I’ve had to produce my birth certificate, and I think most people have had to, but not the President of the United States? That’s very strange indeed. Why we don’t hear about it, because the press won’t report it.”

“Why doesn’t the President have to show he’s a natural-born citizen?,” Moore asked. “There are so many questions about that, and yet the Constitution requires that the President be a natural-born citizen, and we’ve had all kind of suits filed. The press doesn’t mention them and the courts continually reject them. I don’t understand it; I think — they can holler political question all they wish, but it’s a simple fact that if he’s not a natural-born citizen, he’s not qualified to be President, and I don’t care who he is.”

“The President has never produced evidence in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law,” Moore said.

In 2011, Hawaiian officials, at Obama’s request, released the long form of his birth certificate. It indicated that he had, indeed, been born in Hawaii. Conspiracy theorists continue to allege the document was a forgery.

Moore wrote in his dissent, “presentation of a birth certificate is indeed a common means of determining age and citizenship” and the Secretary of State should “investigate the qualifications of those candidates who appeared on the 2012 general-election ballot.”

“Furthermore, I believe the circuit court should have granted the petition for a writ of mandamus to order the Secretary of State to investigate the qualifications of those candidates who appeared on the 2012 general-election ballot for President of the United States,” Moore added.

Read more here:

GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore has said he doesn’t believe Obama is a natural-born citizen – CNN

Intel announces 8th gen. core processors: claims major boost for graphics-heavy applications – TelecomTV

Intel has cunningly latched its 8th generation core processor announcement onto the solar eclipse that yesterday streaked across the continental USA for the first time in about 100 years. New generation processor announcements from Intel arent nearly as rare as eclipses, but both phenomena are supposedly governed by immutable laws. Astronomy in the case of the eclipse and Moore’s Law in the case of Intels processor offerings.

For the uninitiated, Moore’s Law was coined by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 when he noticed that the number of transistors on integrated circuits tended to double every year. He predicted that this would continue for the foreseeable future.

OK, so Moore’s Law isnt exactly immutable, but it has been more or less humming along for the past 52 years and thats quite an achievement for any law. So subtly linking the two things in a blog post penned by Greg Bryant, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Client Computing Group at Intel, was a clever move

Greg took the opportunity to ruminate on how processor technology (Intels especially, of course) had accelerated both hardware development and applications.

If you go back even five years, a thin laptop was still more than 20 mm, 4K content was only starting to take off and Oculus (virtual reality headsets) was kicking off its Kickstarter campaign. Compare that with today: Laptops are less than 11 mm, 4K content is pervasive and, with the advent of Windows Mixed Reality, VR is being baked right into the operating system people use every day.

The last time we experienced an eclipse like this was almost 100 years ago. If you werent directly in its path, you would miss it entirely assuming you even knew it was happening in the first place. Now, people from all over the world can be part of the moment, and a huge number of them will be using their computer. But for those 450 million people using a machine that is more than five years old, the experience will be vastly different. Vastly compromised.

Enough of the shameless promo.

Intel says it is to start rolling out its 8th Gen processor family today, beginning with a range of mobile processors aimed at light notebooks and 2 in 1s.

The big performance improvements will result in real-world application improvements, Intel claims. For instance, manipulating photos or slideshows will be up to 48 per cent faster on 8th Gen vs. devices powered by the processor Intel released last year; while editing video footage will be up to 14.7x faster. Rendering what used to take 45 minutes on a 5-year-old PC, will now take three minutes it claims.

The first wave of 8th Gen Intel Core processor-powered devices featuring i5/i7 processors will come to market beginning in September.

Read this article:

Intel announces 8th gen. core processors: claims major boost for graphics-heavy applications – TelecomTV

Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s


Barron’s
Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore's Law
Barron’s
The notion of the End of Moore's Law is debated Intel refutes it but it's prompting lots of new ideas in chips. One approach is new chip designs, such as Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google's Tensor Processing Unit, a custom chip, something I explored in

View post:

Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s

What is Moore’s Law? – Definition from WhatIs.com

The original Moore’s Law derives from a speech given by Gordon Moore, later a founder of Intel, in 1965, in which he observed that the number of microcomponents that could be placed in an integrated circuit (microchip) of the lowest manufacturing cost was doubling every year and that this trend would likely continue into the future. As this observation and prediction began to be frequently cited, it became known as Moore’s Law. In later years, the Law was occasionally reformulated to mean that rate. The pace of change having slowed down a bit over the past few years, the definition has changed (with Gordon Moore’s approval) to reflect that the doubling occurs only every 18 months.

Go here to see the original:

What is Moore’s Law? – Definition from WhatIs.com

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

In BriefTwo new semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconiumdiselenide have been observed to have similar traits to silicon,and may soon be the materials used to make smaller, more powerfultransistors.

Silicon may no longer be the go-to material used in electronics, if two recently discovered materials are implemented. Electrical engineers at Stanfordrecently observed that two semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide, two forms of the same inorganic compound share similar qualities with silicon, but outperformed the material in other aspects.

A studypublished in the journal Science Advances explains the finding. Co-authored by Eric Pop, an associate professor of electrical engineering, with post-doctoral scholar Michal Mleczko, the report places the biggest emphasis on how all three materials cause rust.

Its the same kind of rust thats usually deemed harmful to metals and other materials, but within the context of electronics and circuitry, its actually a good thing: when silicon is exposed to oxygen, it rusts and becomes an insulator for circuitry, protecting it from harm. Other materials can be used to achieve the same effect, but they require additional work and layers of insulation, making silicon the preferred material to use.

Hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenideboth rust in a similar way to silicon, but their benefits go beyond this. Theyre able to form what are known as high-k insulators, which ultimately require less power than silicon and silicon oxide insulators.

The Stanford engineers also discovered the diselenides can be shrunk down to about three atoms thick; silicon cannot do the same and still be usable.

Engineers have been unable to make silicon transistors thinner than about five nanometers, before the material properties begin to change in undesirable ways, said Pop.

Theres also how the new semiconductor materials deal with the band gap, the range of energy needed to turn a transistor on. If the range of energy for a material is too low, it could cause the circuits to leak; too high, and the circuit then has too much energy to work with, becoming inefficient. The diselenides meet this requirement perfectly. Taking all of their benefits into account, they can be used to make transistors nearly 10 times smaller than whats used today.

This almost perfectly supports Moores Law, which states that transistors will continue to become smaller, more powerful, and more cost-effective at a consistent pace.

While hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide do everything silicon can and more, Pop states that its unlikely silicon will be replaced completely; theres more to study before future electronics see any changes.

To start, theres how the diselenide circuits will interact with transistors; These connections have always proved a challenge for any new semiconductor, and the difficulty becomes greater as we shrink circuits to the atomic scale, Mleczko said. The oxidization of the materials also needs to be improved to ensure the circuits and insulators are long-lasting and maintain their thin size.

As exciting as the finding may be, itll be quite some time before theyre used in complex circuits and complete, working systems. Until then, people can looking forward to owning devices with longer battery lives, which is one of the more immediate benefits that could come, if the new semiconductors are utilized.

Theres more research to do, but a new path to thinner, smaller circuits and more energy-efficient electronics is within reach, Pop said.

See more here:

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

Moore Pushes Ridiculous Islamophobia Claim – Patheos (blog)

Christian fascist Roy Moore, the odds-on favorite to be the next Senator from the state of Alabama (and you didnt think it could get worse than Jeff Sessions), is casually passing along the ridiculous claim that Sharia law is being imposed on cities in the Midwest while admitting he has no idea what hes talking about.

There, reporter Jeff Stein of the website Vox.com asked him, Some right-wing conservatives think Sharia law is a danger to America do you?

Moore responded, There are communities under Sharia law right now in our country. Up in Illinois. Christian communities; I dont know if they may be Muslim communities. But Sharia law is a little different from American law. It is founded on religious concepts.

Says the man who claims that American law is all based on the Bible and that any law that conflicts with the Bible is unconstitutional! For crying out loud, the lack of self-awareness is absolutely mind-blowing.

Stein pressed Moore to name the communities under Sharia law. He responded, Well, theres Sharia law, as I understand it, in Illinois, Indiana up there. I dont know.

Says the man who wrote an opinion saying that the state had the power of the sword and must use it to punish and discourage homosexuality. So its okay when Christians advocate that, but when Muslims advocate the very same thing, thats totally different and un-American. Fascinating. And notice how he admits that he doesnt know, but someone told him that so hes happy to claim it. Come up to Dearborn with me, Roy, and Ill show you all the liquor stores and strip clubs. Thats one of those communities where ignorant bigots like you claim Sharia law is being enforced. No one who lives there seems to have noticed, including the 60% of the population that isnt Muslim.

Ignorance, stupidity, hypocrisy, a total lack of concern for whether what he says is true or not. Yep, those are the telltale signs of a Christian fascist.

Continue reading here:

Moore Pushes Ridiculous Islamophobia Claim – Patheos (blog)

Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s


Barron’s
Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore's Law
Barron’s
The notion of the End of Moore's Law is debated Intel refutes it but it's prompting lots of new ideas in chips. One approach is new chip designs, such as Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google's Tensor Processing Unit, a custom chip, something I explored in

See the original post:

Atomera Hopes to Make Money Solving the Breakdown of Moore’s Law – Barron’s

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

In BriefTwo new semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconiumdiselenide have been observed to have similar traits to silicon,and may soon be the materials used to make smaller, more powerfultransistors.

Silicon may no longer be the go-to material used in electronics, if two recently discovered materials are implemented. Electrical engineers at Stanfordrecently observed that two semiconductors hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide, two forms of the same inorganic compound share similar qualities with silicon, but outperformed the material in other aspects.

A studypublished in the journal Science Advances explains the finding. Co-authored by Eric Pop, an associate professor of electrical engineering, with post-doctoral scholar Michal Mleczko, the report places the biggest emphasis on how all three materials cause rust.

Its the same kind of rust thats usually deemed harmful to metals and other materials, but within the context of electronics and circuitry, its actually a good thing: when silicon is exposed to oxygen, it rusts and becomes an insulator for circuitry, protecting it from harm. Other materials can be used to achieve the same effect, but they require additional work and layers of insulation, making silicon the preferred material to use.

Hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenideboth rust in a similar way to silicon, but their benefits go beyond this. Theyre able to form what are known as high-k insulators, which ultimately require less power than silicon and silicon oxide insulators.

The Stanford engineers also discovered the diselenides can be shrunk down to about three atoms thick; silicon cannot do the same and still be usable.

Engineers have been unable to make silicon transistors thinner than about five nanometers, before the material properties begin to change in undesirable ways, said Pop.

Theres also how the new semiconductor materials deal with the band gap, the range of energy needed to turn a transistor on. If the range of energy for a material is too low, it could cause the circuits to leak; too high, and the circuit then has too much energy to work with, becoming inefficient. The diselenides meet this requirement perfectly. Taking all of their benefits into account, they can be used to make transistors nearly 10 times smaller than whats used today.

This almost perfectly supports Moores Law, which states that transistors will continue to become smaller, more powerful, and more cost-effective at a consistent pace.

While hafnium diselenide and zirconium diselenide do everything silicon can and more, Pop states that its unlikely silicon will be replaced completely; theres more to study before future electronics see any changes.

To start, theres how the diselenide circuits will interact with transistors; These connections have always proved a challenge for any new semiconductor, and the difficulty becomes greater as we shrink circuits to the atomic scale, Mleczko said. The oxidization of the materials also needs to be improved to ensure the circuits and insulators are long-lasting and maintain their thin size.

As exciting as the finding may be, itll be quite some time before theyre used in complex circuits and complete, working systems. Until then, people can looking forward to owning devices with longer battery lives, which is one of the more immediate benefits that could come, if the new semiconductors are utilized.

Theres more research to do, but a new path to thinner, smaller circuits and more energy-efficient electronics is within reach, Pop said.

View original post here:

Are These Thin, Low-Power Semiconductors The Future of Computing? – Futurism

Church over state – Vox

MONTGOMERY, Alabama Stationed outside the entrance to Judge Roy Moores victory party Tuesday night stood two tablets embossed with the Ten Commandments, mounted on an easel and draped in white cloth.

Christian choir music played inside. A video came on in which Moore declared, God is raising up generals all over this great nation. When the early voting returns began rolling in, Moore came out and told the crowd he had run the best campaign of his career before catching himself in the boast.

“But remember,” he quickly added, “all glory goes to God.

On Tuesday night, Moore proved the clear winner in a divisive and fantastically expensive Alabama Republican primary to fill the Senate seat vacated by Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Moore coasted to a first-place finish in a 10-person field, beating out two candidates incumbent Sen. Luther Strange and Tea Party favorite Rep. Mo Brooks with much more money and institutional support. Moore and Strange will now compete in a runoff to conclude the GOP primary on September 26; the general election will follow in December. Moore is in the drivers seat.

Its a remarkable rise for someone once consigned to the far-right fringes of politics, even in Alabama. Over three decades in public life, Moore has defied federal court orders, addressed a white supremacist group, penned invectives against Perez Hilton over same-sex marriage, and argued that Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) should not be seated as a Congress member because he is Muslim.

All of those actions flowed from a conviction about religions role in policy that, by his own accounting, puts Moore far afield from almost all elected Republicans. His ambition isnt merely for the government to carve out a space for free religious exercise, as many conservatives demand; instead, he argues that Christian principles or, more accurately, Moores interpretation of Christian principles should provide the foundation for, and even supersede, the laws of men.

Moores ideology is an express belief that Gods law and his interpretation of Gods law stand on top of mans law, said David Dinielli, deputy director of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Its an ideology that would allow those who think they know the unknowable and the mystic to impose their beliefs on everyone else.

Moores public presentation is that of a private citizen forced against his will to enter into service of his country. He likes to cite the apocryphal tale of Cincinnatus, the Roman general who chooses to turn down vast political powers to return to his farm, and of Thomas Paine at Valley Forge comparing the summer soldier” and “sunshine patriot” to soldiers willing to tough out long Revolutionary winters. A fan of evoking colonial imagery and rhetoric, Moore even rode his brown mare named Sassy, an aide said to the polling station on election day.

Im not a politician. I dont like politicians, Moore told a gun rights group gathered at Mr. Fang’s Chinese restaurant in Homewood on Monday night.

About 15 seconds later, he felt the need to press the point, and returned to it: I am not a politician,” he said. “I do not like politics.”

Moore was 35 when he first ran for, and lost, a judicial post in Etowah County in 1982. “I had decided to run for political office in order to do what I could to preserve our moral heritage,” he writes in his autobiography, So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom. Among those threats, as Moore lists them: a 1985 court case eliminating prayer in the courthouse and a 1963 Supreme Court ruling eliminating Bible studies in public schools.

That loss proved so bitter that afterward he took up karate and became a black belt; moved to Cairns, Australia, where he worked as a kitchen hand; and then herded cattle in the Australian Outback, building stockyards and carrying rocks six days a week.

But Moore has clung to the campaign trail on and off since he returned. He ran for district attorney in 1986 (losing again); for chief justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court in 1999 (he won, though he was forced to step down in 2003); was floated for a run for president with the Constitution Party in 2004; ran for governor of Alabama in 2006 (losing in the GOP primary); ran for governor again in 2010 (and lost again); and then formed an exploratory committee for the 2012 presidential elections before dropping out.

At the gun rights event in Homewood, Moore lowered his head as the leader of the gun rights group ticked through the judges accomplishments on the bench. Moore then took the mic.

“When I hear you say what Ive done, I think to myself, its really not what Ive done; its what God has done through me by putting me in a position to stand for what I believe,” Moore said. “Im not running for this position. Im running to serve God and his will.

The core of Moores ideology is that he denies the legitimacy of state law when it conflicts with his perception of Christian precepts. To Moore, thats because the state derives its legitimacy from God so if law passed by men contradicts that which he perceives as the law of God, the former should have no power over him or his countrymen.

This conviction resulted in the two high-profile national stories that gave Moore the name recognition now powering his Senate run. The first was his decision to install a monument to the Ten Commandments at his courthouse. Despite direct orders from a federal judge, Moore then refused to remove the monument or to cease holding a prayer session in his courtroom.

The Judeo-Christian God reigned over both the church and the state in this country, and that both owed allegiance to that God, he told the Atlantic at the time.

Moores defense in the Ten Commandments case is instructive. One conservative defense of the tablets could be that local courts should have the freedom to erect whatever monuments they want. This was not Moores argument. Instead, he said that the Ten Commandments should stay because they really are divine, and therefore more important than human law.

“The Ten Commandments are not only a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths, as the Supreme Court stated in Stone v Graham,” he writes. “They are God’s revealed, divine law and the basis on which our morality depends.”

Moore was suspended again in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Moore has … encouraged lawlessness by attempting to assemble a virtual army of state officials and judges to oppose the federal judiciary and its tyranny, the SPLC wrote at the time.

Its worth paying attention to exactly why Moore wrote in a 2006 LifeNet column that Rep. Keith Ellison, a Muslim, could not be seated by Congress. Moore argued that the Constitution is founded on specifically Christian principles; anyone whose beliefs fall outside Christian principles, by definition, falls outside that of the Constitution as well.

The Islamic faith rejects our God and believes that the state must mandate the worship of its own god, Allah, he writes. Islamic law is simply incompatible with our law.

When I asked Moore where he believes religions involvement in public life should end, Moore said that the state should not force citizens to follow a certain faith.

You cant force people to worship God in any matter, he said.

But that restriction itself, he added, stems from Christian principles. He defended the First Amendments protection of the free exercise of conscience not on the grounds that the state has a vested interest in pluralism, but because Jesus himself believed in it.

You see, the First Amendment was established on Christian principles, because it was Jesus that said this: Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and render unto God the things that are God’s, Moore told me.

Islamic people practicing under Sharia law, Moore said, didnt have First Amendment protections because First Amendment protections are inescapably Christian.

Thats a Christian concept, he said of the ability to worship according to ones conscience. Its not a Muslim concept. Go to Saudi Arabia. Go to Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, and be a Muslim, and see if you can exit that faith without consequences. You cant do it. You understand? Understand that its a Christian concept.

Moores fundamentalism has helped him advance politically and build a base of support in Alabama. But it has scared those in the state who believe it puts them on the other side of Moores interpretation of Gods intentions.

Moore has made an already difficult life for gay Alabamans even harder, said Alex Smith of Equality Alabama, an LGBTQ rights organization.

We are very concerned about Moore becoming a senator, Smith told me. Its been incredibly terrifying for LGBT folks in the state to watch.

Smith gave one example: Eight judges in Alabama are still not issuing marriage licenses to couples of either sex, following the guidelines of Moores order intended to prevent gay couples from wedding in the state.

New anti-LGBTQ legislation is on its way. In May, Republican Gov. Kay Ivey signed the Child Placing Inclusion Act into law. It allows some agencies to deny LGBTQ couples the ability to adopt children; Moores nonprofit, the Foundation for Moral Law, was instrumental in its passage, according to Smith.

“Being gay in the South isn’t the easiest thing,” said Russell Howard, director of Druid City Pride. “But it’s a whole lot harder when you have someone with Mr. Moore’s positions in power.”

Hezekiah Jackson, president of Birmingham’s NAACP chapter, argued it would be a mistake to view God as behind Moores politics. Instead, he said that Moores religiosity represented a clever front to appeal to identity groups Christians, white men, heterosexuals.

“His thing is simple: He’s a proponent of his own people, Jackson said. That’s it. It’s just obvious.”

In Washington, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell already faces an insurrectionist caucus on his right flank Sens. Rand Paul (KY), Mike Lee (UT), Ted Cruz (TX) that believes the Republican establishment is too eager to compromise with Democrats.

Moore would go further than any of them. If he makes it to Capitol Hill, hed bring a new conservative rebelliousness to the Senate chamber informed by an eye toward God.

See original here:

Church over state – Vox

Alabama GOP Senate frontrunner: there are communities under Sharia law right now – Vox

HOMEWOOD, Alabama Judge Roy Moore, perhaps the leading candidate in todays Alabama Senate race, pulled a laminated copy of Joseph Storys 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution out of his dusty maroon briefcase.

He then flipped about halfway through it and, after running a ruddy finger up and down, pointed to a highlighted line about halfway down the page.

His eyes lit up.

The answer is right here, Moore told me, quoting Storys explanation for the role of religion in American public life, as much from memory as the words in front of him. It was the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America that Christianity ought to be favored by the State, Moore said.

Voters in the GOP primary in this deep red state will choose their candidate today for a general election to replace Sen. Jeff Sessions, who left the seat to become Donald Trumps attorney general. If none of the 10 candidates in the race receive more than 50 percent of the votes on Tuesday, then the top two contenders will head to a run-off in September.

Incumbent Sen. Luther Strange and Rep. Mo Brooks, a Tea Party darling, were expected to be the favorites at the races outset. But against all initial expectations, Judge Moore has shot up to the top of the field and now has a narrow lead in polling, though likely not enough to clear the run-off.

There are communities under Sharia law right now in our country, Moore told me at a meeting of BamaCarry Inc., Alabamas only no compromise gun group, at Mr. Fangs Chinese restaurant here on Monday night. Oklahoma tried passing a law restricting Sharia law, and it failed. Do you know about that?

Moores rebel run has astounded observers both in Washington and in Alabama. The judge first gained prominence in national conservative circles in 2003 for refusing to remove the Ten Commandments from his courthouse, and then again in 2015 for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses after same-sex marriage was legalized.

Theres a school of thought that says the judge can still be beat. The argument goes that once Strange or Brooks gets knocked out, the non-Moore voters will consolidate behind the less extreme choice in the narrower run-off race. (If you think thats a safe bet, may I suggest you recall the 2016 Republican presidential primary.)

Shortly after his speech Monday night, I asked Moore to explain his controversial views on religions role in public life. A transcript of our conversation follows.

Youve talked about how weve done too much to remove religion from public life and public service.

Yeah.

Where would you cut off the other end of the equation? Where should the limits be between religion and public life if you could?

You have to understand what religion is the duties you owe to the creator.

And then it starts there first. You have to understand it was the duty of the government under the First Amendment, according to Joseph Story who was there for 37 years and wrote the stories on the Constitution.

It was the duty to foster religion and foster Christianity. He said at the time of the adoption of the Constitution that it was the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America that Christianity ought to be favored by the State so far as was not incompatible with the private rights of conscience.

So where does that end? Where do you see that ending whats the limit to religions role in public life?

By forcing the conscience of men. Thats far different from observing the rights of men to worship God according to the dictates of their conscience. Thats a completely different thing. You cant force people to worship God in any matter.

But where the public worship of God and support for religion constitutes no part of the duty of the state, your state will have problems.

Let me show you, if I could, since you asked a good question. [Pulls out Story from briefcase]

This is Joseph Story. He is an expert. This is on the First Amendment of the United States Constitution right here. He said, At the time of the adoption of the US Constitution and the amendment to it now it was the general, if not the universal, sentiment in America that Christianity ought to receive encouragement from the State so far as it was not incompatible with the private rights of conscience and freedom of religious worship. An attempt to level all religions, and to make it a matter of state policy to hold all in utter indifference, would have created universal disapprobation, if not universal indignation.

The question you asked, What are the limits? The answer is right here. But the duty of encouraging religion, especially the Christian religion, is very different from the right to force the conscience of other men or to punish them from worshipping God in the manner which they believe they are accountable to him requires. Thats the difference; thats where it stops you cant force the conscience of other men.

But to deny God to deny Christianity or Christian principles is to deny what the First Amendment was established for. You see, the First Amendment was established on Christian principles, because it was Jesus that said this: “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and render unto God the things that are God’s. He recognized the jurisdiction the government does not have and that was the freedom of conscience.

If you were a complete atheist, or a Buddhist, or a Muslim, or whatever, you have freedom in this country to worship God and you cant be forced otherwise. Thats a Christian concept. Its not a Muslim concept.

Go to Saudi Arabia. Go to Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, and be a Muslim, and see if you can exit that faith without consequences. You cant do it. You understand? Understand that its a Christian concept thats one element of finding the way this country was established on Christian principles, because the concept of freedom of conscience that doesnt exist in many other countries.

Youre saying that inherent in the separation of church and state is a Christian ideal?

Separation of church and state is a very religious process. Its about how God ordained in Romans 13 the different jurisdictions of government.

Its been improperly reported that I said that Muslims dont have rights under the First Amendment. And I have just written an article in the Washington Post to clarify that thats absolutely false. Thats not what I believe.

Some right-wing conservatives think Sharia law is a danger to America do you?

There are communities under Sharia law right now in our country. Up in Illinois. Christian communities; I dont know if they may be Muslim communities.

But Sharia law is a little different from American law. It is founded on religious concepts.

Which American communities are under Sharia law? When did they fall under Sharia law?

Well, theres Sharia law, as I understand it, in Illinois, Indiana up there. I don’t know.

That seems like an amazing claim for a Senate candidate to make.

Well, let me just put it this way if they are, they are; if theyre not, theyre not.

That doesnt matter. Oklahoma tried passing a law restricting Sharia law, and it failed. Do you know about that?

No, I dont.

Well, it did. The thing about it is it shouldnt have failed because it can be restricted because its based on religious principles …

Be careful on the religion because its very confusing. People dont explain the definition of religion. Put it right at the top, Religion is the duties you owe to the creator and the manner of discharging it, per the United States Supreme Court, per Joseph Story.

When you define religion we get it all straight. Youre free to worship Buddha and Muhammed. The reason that is free is because of Christian principles. Because of the two tables of the law the first table cant be directed by government. He never gave Caesar the authority over the rights of conscience. In fact, it says it right here if you look right there, that the rights of conscience are beyond the reach of any human power; they are given by God and cannot be encroached on by any human authority without a criminal disobedience of the precepts of natural or revealed religion. …

Id like to learn more about the communities in America you think are under Sharia law.

I was informed that there were. But if theyre not, it doesnt matter. Sharia law incorporates Muslim law into the law. Thats not what we do. We do not punish people according to the Christian precepts of our faith so theres a difference.

Ill just say: I dont know if there are. I understand that there are some.

Correction: An early version of this story incorrectly stated the year gay marriage was legalized.

Read more from the original source:

Alabama GOP Senate frontrunner: there are communities under Sharia law right now – Vox

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Accounting Profession – CPAPracticeAdvisor.com

The relentless advance of technology. You are aware of it. Whether you are boomer, a millennial, or even Gen Z (some call them the iGeneration). We cant deny it. We live in a time of technological marvels. And the velocity of development related to technology is only accelerating.

Moores Law, first predicted in 1965, historically noted that chip performance would double every 18 months. In 2015, Scientific American reported that the prediction was celebrating 50 years because it has held true with uncanny accuracyfor the past 50 years. (Annie Sneed on May 19, 2015). Of course, many have heard of the comparison of Apollo 11 technology to the smart phones on the market today. There is more computing power on your smartphone then there was on the 1969 Apollo 11 mission to the moon.

You may vaguely recall a chess match between Garry Kasparov (then World Chess Champion) and the IBM 1997 Deep Blue supercomputer. Was that an early demonstration of artificial intelligence (AI)? No matter. If you have an iPhone today, you have more computing power in your hand than Deep Blue had in 1997. Now a believer in AI, Garry Kasparov says that AI is capable of providing us with endless opportunities to extend our capabilities and improve our lives.

So, what is the future of AI? What does it possibly mean for the CPA profession? Most simply it means that the profession will evolve. The role of the CPA will change. While there are many skeptics, I dont buy it. Historically, advances in technology have changed jobs. To be fair, some jobs have simply vanished (there arent a lot of blacksmiths these days).

CPA will be redefined. Some tasks that have bogged down the ability of CPAs to add true value will be taken over by smart machines. Efficiency and accuracy will be improved. In fact, AI may be a driver of new services that are not even thought of today. The CPA of the not too distant future will be able to focus on true value adding services. Much less focus on compliance.

Since the ongoing development of AI is inevitable, CPAs should not focus on job elimination, but transformation of the profession. What might the implications be for training new members of the profession? Staff accountant jobs will likely change the most. Learning and the statutory requirements embedded in state laws and regulations for learning must evolve quickly.

Keep in mind that CPA is defined in state law. It is also quite likely that the overall regulatory framework for the profession will need to evolve. If that is that case, we better get ahead of that because the legislative and regulatory process is so dreadfully slow. While it is very hard to predict what language should be in state law to define the profession in the future, we need to start talking about it.

In the final analysis, AI is not a threat to the CPA profession. It is not a threat to those CPAs who embrace not only technology, but embrace change. With the proper perspective and an innovative mindset, AI is beginning to present a world of opportunity to a profession that has successfully evolved since Luca Pacioli “The Father of Accounting and Bookkeeping” invented double entry book-keeping in 1494.

————-

Gary Bolinger, CAE, is President & CEO of the Indiana Society of CPAs.

Read the original:

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of the Accounting Profession – CPAPracticeAdvisor.com

Micron, Everspin: Memory Taking Prominence from Processors … – Barron’s


Barron’s
Micron, Everspin: Memory Taking Prominence from Processors …
Barron’s
Stifel Nicolaus analyst Kevin Cassidy writes that trends in memory chips such as NAND flash and non-volatile memory show the parts are gaining greater and …
The Ironic And Fleeting Volatility In NVM StorageThe Next Platform

all 7 news articles »

View post:

Micron, Everspin: Memory Taking Prominence from Processors … – Barron’s

Super-thin semiconductors delay the ‘death’ of silicon – Engadget – Engadget

The scientists stress that you’d still need silicon, but the combination of these new materials with silicon could still lead to far more complex processors, much longer battery life, and other advantages that usually come with shrinking transistor sizes. Moore’s Law can’t last forever (the laws of physics won’t allow it), but this could delay the inevitable for many years.

As with many semiconductor breakthroughs, the biggest challenge is simply getting this to market. The Stanford team needs to improve the contact between transistors and these circuits, not to mention improve the reliability of the insulation itself. And of course, there’s the not-so-small matter of putting these semiconductors into a full-size, production-worthy chip. It could take years before this work makes a difference, and by that point the chip industry might already be struggling. If it doesn’t take too long, though, this might give the computing industry a much-needed lifeline.

Read this article:

Super-thin semiconductors delay the ‘death’ of silicon – Engadget – Engadget

"Moore’s Law" predicts $100,000 for Bitcoin in February 2021 … – Markets Morning

Bitcoin is still at a record rate, after the crypt-diet on Tuesday has reached a value of 3,500 US dollar per coin. The growth comes exactly one week before a big change in the Bitcoin network. On Tuesday, Bitcoins Blockchain will integrate a new software, Segregated Witness, or SegWit.

SegWit is a clever solution, significantly increasing the capacity for transactions, said Aaron Lasher, Head of Marketing at Breadwallet, a Bitcoin Wallet company.

The software was developed years ago and should solve the scaling problem of the crypt diet, which broke the brokerage for years and finally led to a split on 1 August .

The investors were unaffected by the split on 1 August, which resulted in the formation of a clone called Bitcoin Cash.

Sheba Jafari, strategy manager at Goldman Sachs, said in July that the crypt diet had the thing to rise to 3,691. Jafari had already been right with her assumptions, and she also said that she was the most important person.

The value of the bitcoin cryptographic may exceed $100,000 by February 2021. This is what Investor Denis Porto, who is a Harvard scientist, thinks. He is of the opinion that bitcoin is the first digital currency to obey Moores Law.

According to this law, formulated by the co-founder of Intels Gordon Moore Processor, the number of transistors on the new microprocessor models will increase approximately twice every 18-24 months.

Moores law is specifically applied to the number of transistors per circuit, but it can be applied to any digital technology, said Porto. Any technology that grows exponentially (i.e. following Moores Law) has a doubling moment, he adds.

The scientists comments come as a result of the separation of an alternative bitcoin-bitcoin cash branch, with the new cryptoLight quickly becoming the third largest. At the same time, the value of the original bitcoin continued to rise and on Aug. 7 for the first time exceeded $3400 per issue.

On Tuesday, Bloomberg wrote that a Russian company is preparing to boost the bitcoin yield in the country. The co-owner of the company in question is one of Vladimir Putins advisers on Internet issues Dmitry Marinichev. Russia has the potential to reach a 30% share of the worlds extraction of crypto-clay in the future, he said.

The idea is to use Russias cheap electricity to challenge Chinas position as the largest market for digital mining. The holding company, known as the Russian Miner Coin (RMC), plans to use semiconductor chips designed in Russia for use in satellites to minimize power consumption in crypto cell mining computers.

RMC will conduct a sort of initial public offering, with investors in the holding being able to use ethereum or bitcoin to buy a new digital currency type from RMC. The new currency will be worth 18% of the revenue generated by the companys mining equipment.

See the rest here:

"Moore’s Law" predicts $100,000 for Bitcoin in February 2021 … – Markets Morning

This is not Trump’s economy – American Enterprise Institute

How much credit should President Trump get for a U.S. economy thats generating lots of jobs and for a stock market that keeps setting record highs?

Very little.

A trader wears a Donald Trump hat while working on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) shortly after the opening bell in New York, U.S., March 16, 2017. Reuters

Trump, of course, thinks MAGAnomics is doing the trick, as do his most ardent supporters. After the July jobs numbers came out last week, Fox News and other members of Team Trump were touting the more than 1 million private-sector jobs created since Inauguration Day. Over on Trump TV, former CNN pundit Kayleigh McEnany was even crediting the president with personally creating them. That Obama created the same number of jobs during his final six months was considered less newsworthy, apparently.

Presidents are always given too much credit or blame for economic performance on their watch. So many factors are outside their control. But beyond that, the idea that this is already Trumps economy is ridiculous. None of Trumps big agenda items at least the ones corporate America and Wall Street really care about have become law. No ObamaCare repeal. No massive tax cuts. No trillion-dollar infrastructure. Nothing.

To the extent that any president owns an economys performance, were still in the Obama era. Indeed, we really ought to credit the economic performance during the first year of any presidents term to his predecessor after all, its mostly that other guys budgets and policies directly influencing the economy. So for instance, George W. Bushs economy wasnt from 2001 through the end of 2008 it was 2002 through the end of 2009. And so on.

This change would make a big difference. During George W. Bushs two terms, GDP growth averaged 2.1 percent as 1.4 million new jobs were added. Pretty unimpressive. But recalculated Bush gets Obamas first year and loses his first year to Bill Clinton and the 43rd presidents record looks even worse: just 1.5 percent growth and a loss of 1.1 million jobs.

This isnt to say Trump should get zero credit for anything good thats happened this year. Its certainly reasonable that the stock markets 10 percent rise since Trump took the oath of office at least partially reflects investor expectations about his growth plan. But how much? Its always tough to parse these things. Believe it or not, theres more going on in the world than Trump, such as a synchronized upswing in the global economy for the first time since the Great Recession.

There are more complications that dont easily fit the GOPs pro-Trump narrative: First, even when new policies or the expectations of policy changes matter, too much weight shouldnt be given to short-term performance. The very large Reagan tax cuts in the early 1980s were supposed to improve U.S. productivity growth. But there was no upturn until the mid-1990s. This time around, tax cuts might boost growth, but probably not too much if they are temporary and greatly worsen the deficit.

Second, dont forget the Federal Reserve. The Obama recovery is as much if not more the Bernanke-Yellen recovery, just as easing by the Volcker Fed helped ignite the Reagan boom. With the Yellen Fed thinking the economy is near or at full employment, the central bank could offset further fiscal stimulus with more rapid and continued tightening of monetary policy. Or monetary policy could stay loose and continue as a tailwind to growth.

Third, Washington isnt the whole ballgame. While one might partially credit the 1990s boom to Reaganomics tax and regulatory changes, one should also credit Moores Law, the PC revolution, and the emergence of the internet. Whatever Trump does might pale compared to whats happening in Silicon Valley. As I wrote last week, the IT revolution is far from over and might still have a huge impact on productivity and growth.

This isnt the Trump economy. If anything, its the Obama economy or the AmazonAppleFacebookGoogle economy.

Continue reading here:

This is not Trump’s economy – American Enterprise Institute

Bitcoin Gets Technology Theory Backing, Can Reach $100000 by 2021 – Bitcoinist

Darryn Pollock August 10, 2017 11:45 am

Moores Law has been identified by a Harvard Scientist in Bitcoin, and as such the belief is that the digital currency can reach $100,000 by February 2021, according to this theorem.

With Bitcoin reaching a big milestone in its scaling debate, an issue that has dogged the digital currency for some time, it is now once again breaking records with little slowing it down.

Fear and speculation ran rampant leading up to the August 1 hard fork, which saw the creation of a new digital currency called Bitcoin Cash a fork of the original Bitcoin. However, even since its creation, and rise to third-largest digital currency for a while in regards to market cap, it has not slowed Bitcoins growth.

Moores Law is a theorem and a formula that was created by the co-founder of Intels Gordon Moore Processor. It states that, on a processor, the number of transistors on the new microprocessor models will increase approximately twice every 18-24 months.

This law has been identified by Denis Porto, and investor, as well as a Harvard Scientist. It is his opinion that Bitcoin has become the first digital currency to show signs of this law, even though it is not specifically aimed at this form of technology.

In a recent interview with Markets Morning, Porto said:

Moores law is specifically applied to the number of transistors per circuit, but it can be applied to any digital technology. []Any technology that grows exponentially (i.e. following Moores Law) has a doubling moment.

In the wake of Bitcoin reaching its latest all time high last week, optimism and confidencehave skyrocketed once again for the original digital currency.There have been a number of factors that have pushed Bitcoins growth, and those same factors have seen it follow the trajectory of Moores Law as identified by Porto.

Bitcoins ability to scale through SegWit, and suffer no ill effects from the hard fork, and instead grow to new heights has set this path to $100,000 in the next four years.

There are other factors in the pipeline as well that can also help Bitcoin to stick to this trajectory of $100,000 as on Tuesday it was reported that Russia is looking to take over the mantle as the king of Bitcoin mining.

Dmitry Marinichev, one of Russian President Vladimir Putins advisors, is preparing to boost Russia to be the global power of Bitcoin mining, in an attempt to compete with China.

Are these prediction far too high? Can an asset really reach such prices or is there a real threat of a bubble? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

Images courtesy of Pixabay, Texas Instruments, Cryptocompare

More:

Bitcoin Gets Technology Theory Backing, Can Reach $100000 by 2021 – Bitcoinist


...1020...2829303132...4050...