Even though it may have been one of the most controversial titles of 2016, I have a sneaking suspicion that the best video game science fiction plot last year was in No Man’s Sky.
No Man’s Sky is an acquired taste. It’s not a space combat simulation, or a hardcore physics simulator. Its standard mode isn’t even really a challenging survival game, although it does have some survival elements. Instead, No Man’s Sky is a combination of the mission statement from Star Trek and a restful camping trip: it gives the player an entire galaxy to explore, without any time limits or urgency. It may not be for everybody, but for somebody like me (particularly with how badly 2016 turned out), wandering around alien planets and playing Charles Darwin is a much needed relaxing game experience.
But, there is a story there, if one is inclined to follow it – and it’s even a brain-breaking one, which the ending complements perfectly. Unfortunately, in large part due to a misstep by Hello Games that made the entire Atlas storyline look like the beginning tutorial, it’s one that many players missed. And it’s all about the simulation hypothesis.
The simulation hypothesis is the theory that our entire reality is a simulation of a universe in an alien computer. Variations on this theme – reality as an illusion – have been around for a very long time. The modern theory began with a paper titled “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation” by Oxford University philosopher Nick Bostrom.
Bostrom’s argument was, in his words:
A technologically mature “posthuman” civilization would have enormous computing power. Based on this empirical fact, the simulation argument shows that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage is very close to zero; (2) The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running ancestor-simulations is very close to zero; (3) The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one.
It’s an interesting argument, and one that has found support in a some surprising places – both Elon Musk and Neil DeGrasse Tyson have expressed support for it (although, to be fair, a closer reading of both Musk and Tyson suggests that they have not adopted the idea beyond a thought experiment). The question is how to prove it, with the best suggestion being to look for glitches in our reality that can only exist because of imperfections in the simulation, and the most common proof being considered our creating a simulated universe of our own (based on point #2 of Bostrom’s argument).
I am not a supporter of this hypothesis, and I think there are problems with it on just about every level. For one thing, it represents a reintroduction of mysticism into science after centuries of removing it, with God being swapped out for an alien computer. For another, the proof of creating a simulation ourselves begs a massive question of just how many simulations deep we are. It also makes huge assumptions about what a post-human society would look like and do – simulating a universe to understand our own makes perfect sense right now from a pure research point of view (consider for a moment how many things we simulate today), and that’s not likely to change for any civilization with sufficient curiosity about how their universe works. Or, put another way, as we develop better tools for theoretical research using simulation, those tools will invariably be used.
And then there’s the issue of games and gamers, which might best be illustrated by a scene from the Ender’s Game movie. There is a moment where, facing a simulation where a giant offers Ender a choice between two poisoned chalices, Ender brutally murders the giant instead. The administrators monitoring the simulation are shocked because nobody has ever done this before – except this holds no water. Anybody playing the game would have seen the giant as a puzzle to be solved, and once it was clear that both chalices were poisoned, would have moved on to other solutions. In reality, the administrators would have been inundated with cadets finding new and creative ways to kill and otherwise get around this giant, because that’s what people do when they play games.
Likewise, if you look at video games as an example, we’ve simulated almost everything one could imagine. Alien planets – done that (Alpha Centauri). The Medieval past – meet Shadowlands, Total War, and any other number of historically based Medieval games. The entire Milky Way galaxy – meet Elite Dangerous, whose galactic model is so sophisticated that it has successfully predicted exoplanets. The entire history of a world created at the beginning of each playthrough – welcome to Dwarf Fortress. We don’t just simulate things and places for pure research, we do it for recreation. The only reason we have yet to create an entire simulated universe to play in is that a computer powerful enough to do so has not hit the general market.
And this is where the story built into No Man’s Sky becomes an amazing and brain-breaking piece of science fiction. As the player progresses through the game, they discover that not only is the entire galaxy a computer simulation, but that the player character is an AI created by the Atlas, the program controlling the simulation, for the express purpose of mapping and expanding it. Because the galaxy is a simulation, there is no possible escape – the best the player character can hope for is to be freed after serving the Atlas’ purpose and/or to be bounced into the next simulated galaxy after reaching the galactic core.
But because it is a story of a simulated galaxy in an actual simulated galaxy, it reaches into the real world in a meta level that no other game has ever attempted, much less achieved. If you believe in the simulation hypothesis, No Man’s Sky is the first step to proving that our reality is nothing more than an illusion. If you don’t believe in it, the game affirms reality in a perfect example of why the hypothesis doesn’t work – it is a simulation of a galaxy made for no other reason than recreation that by its mere existence explodes the idea that nobody outside of a simulation would ever have a reason to create such a thing. And that is simply breathtaking.
Robert B. Marks is the author of Diablo: Demonsbane, The EverQuest Companion, and Garwulf’s Corner. His newest book, An Odyssey into Video Games and Pop Culture, is available in print and Kindle formats. He also has a Livejournal and is on Facebook.
Garwulf’s Corner is made possible by the support of readers like you (and I want to categorically deny any rumours that Patreon funds are being used to fund both sides of the Sentinel-Vykeen war). If you would like to see more content like this, please visit the Patreon, and if you can, contribute.
Read the rest here:
- Ozzfest 2001: Where Are They Now? The Second Millennium - Metal Injection.net - August 20th, 2017
- How religious and non-religious people view the apocalypse - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - August 20th, 2017
- What to See in New York Art Galleries This Week - New York Times - August 18th, 2017
- Dawn of posthuman age - The Statesman - August 14th, 2017
- 9th Beyond Humanism Conference Wrap Up - Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies - August 11th, 2017
- Posthuman advertising: does AI spell the end of media and marketing as we know it? - Marketing magazine Australia (registration) - August 8th, 2017
- July 31, 2017 - Nam June Paik Art Center - Our Bright Future-Cybernetic Fantasy - E-Flux - August 2nd, 2017
- Q&A with MCA's Anna Davis | ArtsHub Australia - ArtsHub (subscription) - July 31st, 2017
- Pulitzer Prize Winner Jorie Graham's Collection of Poetry, 'Fast', Will Haunt You, Beautifully - PopMatters - July 25th, 2017
- An Interview With Rick Rosner on Women and the Future (Part 4) - The Good Men Project (blog) - July 9th, 2017
- Why We're Probably Living in a Computer Simulation - Inverse - June 24th, 2017
- Milano Arch Week - E-Flux - June 14th, 2017
- The body electric - Arkansas Times - June 8th, 2017
- Inaugural Milano Arch Week - E-Flux - May 26th, 2017
- How the Androids Took Over the Alien Franchise - New Republic - May 23rd, 2017
- Our Posthuman Future - Wikipedia - May 20th, 2017
- Oklahoma filmmaker Kyle Roberts roars back into the 1920s with ... - NewsOK.com - May 13th, 2017
- ARCH+ 228: "StadtlandThe New Rurbanism" - E-Flux - April 27th, 2017
- March Madness in the Meatpacking District - The New Yorker - March 31st, 2017
- Supergirl Season 2 Episode 16 Review: Star-Crossed - Den of Geek US - March 21st, 2017
- Musk and Bostrom's computer simulation theory isn't as crazy as it first sounds - The Plaid Zebra (blog) - March 10th, 2017
- At the Spencer, surprises from new Asian artists - Pitch Weekly - March 7th, 2017
- The Ninja Tune forum has shut down after 19 years - FACT - March 6th, 2017
- Things Are Super Weird Right Now, but It's Not a Glitch in the Matrix, Says Harvard Physicist - ScienceAlert - March 4th, 2017
- '10 Years of I Love Acid' compilation comes on a 303-shaped USB stick - Mixmag - February 28th, 2017
- I Love Acid's 10th anniversary compilation comes on a 303-shaped USB stick - FACT - February 28th, 2017
- Posthuman EP | Cosmic Bridge Records - February 24th, 2017
- Btonsalon Center for Art and Research - E-Flux - February 22nd, 2017
- Prairie Pop: NPR's Codrescu breaks down Dadaism's ongoing influence - Little Village - February 14th, 2017
- Will we control innovation or will it control us? - The Daily Courier (subscription) - February 12th, 2017
- The Ethics of Innovation: Creativity, Machines, and Artificial Intelligence - Kootenay News Advertiser - February 10th, 2017
- Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA) - E-Flux - February 6th, 2017
- ACADIA | 2016 Conference - November 30th, 2016
- N. Katherine Hayles - Wikipedia - November 25th, 2016
- New Romance: art and the posthuman :: Museum of ... - November 21st, 2016
- Rise of the Posthuman Technocracy : Waking Times - November 21st, 2016
- Marilyn Manson: Posthuman - YouTube - November 6th, 2016
- Amazon.com: The Posthuman (9780745641584): Rosi Braidotti ... - September 8th, 2016
- Plurilogue: The Posthuman - June 27th, 2016
- The Posthuman Manifesto by Robert Pepperell, Kritikos V.2 ... - May 4th, 2016
- Posthuman NewArrival - Miniature Market - February 23rd, 2016
- Posthuman Futures | abhominal | experimentations on the ... - January 2nd, 2016
- Book - Rosi Braidotti - The Posthuman - December 27th, 2015
- Singularity (Posthuman transcension) - Palaeos - December 20th, 2015
- Posthuman | Board Game | BoardGameGeek - December 14th, 2015
- Posthuman | Board Game | BoardGameGeek - December 14th, 2015
- The Posthuman Project: Official Trailer #1 - YouTube - October 15th, 2015
- Review of Our Posthuman Future - September 7th, 2015
- In Defense of Posthuman Dignity - Nick Bostrom - August 22nd, 2015
- Kenan Malik's review of Our Posthuman Future by Francis ... - August 19th, 2015
- What does it mean to be posthuman? - New Scientist - August 17th, 2015
- Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman, prologue - August 15th, 2015
- The Posthuman Project: Official Trailer #2 - YouTube - August 15th, 2015
- Posthumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - July 28th, 2015
- PostHuman (2012) - IMDb - July 21st, 2015