Public release date: 16-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Cathia Falvey cfalvey@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, May 16, 2012The inaugural issue of BioResearch Open Access, a new bimonthly peer-reviewed open access journal, was released today by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. The Journal provides a new rapid-publication forum for a broad range of scientific topics including but not limited to molecular and cellular biology, tissue engineering and biomaterials, regenerative medicine, stem cells, gene therapy, systems biology, genetics, biochemistry, virology, microbiology, and neuroscience. The first issue is available on the BioResearch Open Access website at http://www.liebertpub.com/biores.

The premier issue includes research papers and a brief report from the U.S., U.K., Germany, and Korea on diverse topics such as tissue engineering, stem cells, HIV, and genetics. Forthcoming papers for the second issue include genetics, xenotransplantation, nuclear transfer, and cardiac research.

The Journal is under the leadership of Editor-in-Chief Jane Taylor, PhD, Senior Research Fellow, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, and seasoned journal editors as Section Editors, including James M. Wilson, MD, PhD, University of Pennsylvania; Antonios G. Mikos, PhD, Rice University; Professor Sir Ian Wilmut, OBE FRS FRSE, University of Edinburgh; Peter C. Johnson, MD, Scintellix, LLC, Raleigh, NC; Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey, PhD, SENS Foundation, Cambridge, UK; Alan J. Russell, PhD, Carnegie Mellon University; Thomas Hope, PhD, Northwestern University; Ganes C. Sen, PhD, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Bruce A. Sullenger, PhD, Duke University Medical Center; Graham C. Parker, PhD, Wayne State University School of Medicine; Carol Shoshkes Reiss, PhD, New York University; Stephen C. Ekker, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; John B. West, MD, PhD, University of California, San Diego; David L. Woodland, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer, Keystone Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology; Stephen Higgs, PhD, Kansas State University; Eugene Kolker, PhD, Seattle Children’s Hospital; and Domenico Grasso, PhD, PE, DEE, University of Vermont.

The Journal welcomes basic science and translational research in the form of original research articles, comprehensive review articles, mini-reviews, rapid communications, brief reports, technical reports, hypothesis articles, perspectives, and letters to the editor. All articles in BioResearch Open Access will be published online within 4 weeks of acceptance. Articles will be fully open access and posted on PubMedCentral. All articles submitted through July 15, 2012 will be made open access without article processing charges. BioResearch Open Access is fully NIH-, HHMI-, and Wellcome Trust compliant.

“BioResearch Open Access is a fully refereed multidisciplinary journal and provides all the checks and balances that rigorous peer review ensures,” says Mary Ann Liebert, president of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. “An outstanding editorial team comprised of experienced journal editors guarantees the integrity of the Journal.”

###

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Tissue Engineering, Human Gene Therapy, Nucleic Acid Therapeutics, Stem Cells and Development, Viral Immunology, DNA and Cell Biology, and Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at http://www.liebertpub.com.

Read more:

Premier issue of BioResearch Open Access launched by Mary Ann Liebert Inc. publishers

Hamamy syndrome is a rare genetic disorder which is marked by abnormal facial features and defects in the heart, bone, blood and reproductive cells. Its exact cause was unknown until now. The international team, led by scientists at IMB, have pinpointed the genetic mistake to be a mutation in asingle gene called IRX5.

This is the first time that a mutation in IRX5 (and the family of IRX genes) has ever been discovered in man. IRX5 is part of a family of transcription factors that is highly conserved in all animals, meaning that this gene is present not only in humans but also in mice, fish, frogs, flies and even worms. Using a frog model, the scientists demonstrated that Irx5 orchestrates cell movements in the developing foetus which underlie head and gonad formation.

Carine Bonnard, a final-year PhD student at IMB and the first author of the paper, said, “Because Hamamy syndrome causes a wide range of symptoms, not just in newborn babies but also in the adult, this implies that IRX5 is critical for development in the wombas well as for the function of many organs in our adult body. For example, patients with this disease cannot evacuate tears from their eyes, and they will also go on to experience repetitive bone fractures (Annex A) or progressive myopia as they age.This discovery of the causative gene is a significant finding that will catalyze research efforts into the role of the Irx gene family and greatly increase our understanding of human health, such as bone homeostasis, or gamete formation for instance.”

“We believe that this discovery could open up new therapeutic solutions to common diseases like osteoporosis, heart disease, anaemia which affect millions of people worldwide,” said Dr Bruno Reversade, Senior Principle Investigator at IMB. “Thefindings also provide a framework for understanding fascinating evolutionary questions, such as why humans of different ethnicities have distinct facial features and how these are embedded in our genome. IRX genes have been repeatedly co-opted duringevolution, and small variation in their activity could underlie fine alterations in the way we look, or perhaps even drastic ones such as the traits seen in an elephant, whale, turtle or frog body pattern.”

Only a handful of people in the worldhave been identified with Hamamy Syndrome making it a very rare genetic disorder. Rare genetic diseases, usually caused by mutations in a single gene, provide a unique opportunity to better understand more common disease processes. These “natural”experiments are similar to carefully controlled knockout animal experiments in which the function of single genes are analyzed and often give major insights into general health issues.[2]

Prof Birgitte Lane, Executive Director of IMB, said, “Understanding how various pathways in the human body function is the foundation for developing new therapeutic targets. This is an important piece of research that I believe will be of great interest to many scientists and clinicians around the world becauseofthe clinical and genetic insights it brings to a large range of diseases.”

Notes for editor: The research findings described in this news release can be found on Nature Genetics’s website under the title “Mutations in IRX5 impair craniofacialdevelopment and germ cell migration via SDF1″ by Carine Bonnard[1], Anna C Strobl[2], Mohammad Shboul1, Hane Lee[3], Barry Merriman[3], Stanley F Nelson[3], Osama H Ababneh[4], Elif Uz[5],[6], Tulay Guran[7], Hulya Kayserili[8], Hanan Hamamy[9],[10]& Bruno Reversade[1],[11].

[1] Institute of Medical Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore

[2] Division of Systems Biology, Medical Research Council National Institute for Medical Research, London,UK

[3] Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Continued here:

Scientists Make Groundbreaking Discovery Of Mutation Causing Genetic Disorder In Humans

Viruses act as tiny piezoelectric generators

Viruses, tiny chunks of protein and nucleic acid, have long plagued mankind and its evolutionary ancestors before it. But thanks to the wonders of modern genetic engineering, researchers believe they have finally been able to instill a beneficial purpose in these deadly pests.

I. From Pest to Power

A team of researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory — one of 16 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories — has created a special breed of virus that undergoes self-nanoassembly to form tiny piezoelectric generators — machines which harvest mechanical energy (vibrations or pressure) to directly produce electricity.

The special “bug” is the M13 bacteriophage, a rod-shaped virus that only infects bacteria (such asE. coli bacteria)– not humans.

Faculty researchersSeung-Wuk Lee, Ramamoorthy Ramesh, and Byung Yang Lee selected the virus due to its tendency to self-assemble into nanofilms, given its rod-like shape. The viruses tightly pack “like chopsticks in a box” and are easy to grow by the millions given a small supply of host bacteria.

II. Refining the Virus

But the effect was too weak to be of use. So the researchers spliced a quadruplet of negatively charged amino acids into one of the coat proteins. The results was a larger voltage gradient across the coat. The researchers also tested stacking films of the modifed viruses to see how thick they could layer the viruses in order to get the maximum effect.

When pressure was applied to the film a 400 millivolt, 6 nanoampere current was put off. That’s about a quarter of the voltage of an AAA battery, albeit at a far smaller current. Still it was enough to power a ’1′ to show up on a low-power liquid crystal display.

Visit link:

Berkeley Trains "Harmless" Viruses to Harvest Human Kinetic Energy

Public release date: 14-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Sophie Mohin smohin@liebertpub.com Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, May 7, 2012 In direct contrast to the increasingly cumbersome and frustrating current model for authoring, editing, reviewing, and publishing scientific literature, Kondziolka et al. have developed an interactive knowledge network, called World Science, that will radically change how scientific knowledge is written, published, and shared. This breakthrough in scientific publishing is featured in an article in the inaugural issue of Disruptive Science and Technology, a peer-reviewed journal published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. To request a copy of the article “A Knowledge Network for Authoring, Reviewing, Editing, Searching, and Using Scientific or Other Credible Information,” please contact journalmarketing1@liebertpub.com.

“We believe this new interactive network sets up, for the first time, what we think is the next century of credible information communication across the world,” says Douglas S. Kondziolka, MD, MS, FRCS, Peter J. Jannetta Professor of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh & UPMC.

By including multiple elements of knowledge engagement, users, readers, and reviewers can easily examine papers with intuitive and user-friendly tools. On a broader scale, all of the contributors, reviewers, and publishers become part of an integrated knowledge network that focuses on increasing the flow and sharing of scientific information worldwide.

###

About the Journal

Disruptive Science and Technology, a breakthrough, highly innovative, peer-reviewed journal spearheaded by Editor-in-Chief Alan J. Russell, PhD, Highmark Distinguished Professor, Carnegie Mellon University, cultivates, harnesses, and explores how existing paradigms can be changed to improve human health, well-being, and productivity. The Journal provides a multimedia platform and forum for ideas and opportunities, promotes breakthrough science and engineering, facilitates the innovator-market relationship, and accelerates the transition from bench to society. Bold, transparent, and resistant to limitations driven by protection of the science and engineering status quo, Disruptive Science and Technology provides the first destination for those seeking to publish game-changing results that have the capacity to alter the way we live. For complete journal details, please visit the Disruptive Science and Technology website at http://www.disruptivescience.com.

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Tissue Engineering, Human Gene Therapy and HGT Methods, and Rejuvenation Research. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, newsmagazines, and books is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at www.liebertpub.com.

See the article here:

Paradigm-shifting publishing format for scientific research

The battle over the future of Albany’s Gill Tract has tapped into multiple, deep-seated conflicts that perennially dominate Bay Area politics, from land use and development to food ethics. But in one area, the roots of disagreement are potentially very deep: biotechnology and its uses.

Genetic engineering has been a topic of intense debate since its emergence in the early 1970s when scientists developed methods to cut and paste fragments of DNA, creating genetically modified organisms GMOs. Some claim that GMOs represent a dangerous leap in the technological manipulation of life. Critics also point out that GMO research products benefit large corporations, producing proprietary crop varieties designed to promote industrialized models of agriculture, at the expense of small farmers and the public. Proponents, meanwhile, contend that genetic engineering is simply a new tool that could, if responsibly applied, enable humanity to better provide for the common good.

The East Bay encapsulates the entire debate like no place else. UC Berkeley and many of its spin-off companies are on the cutting edge of biotech. This university-led academic-industrial combine has arguably done more to promote the genetic engineering of food crops than any other cluster of institutions. Paradoxically, the Bay Area is also an epicenter for GMO opposition. It’s no wonder, then, that the issue has lurked in the background of the recent farm occupation in Albany.

While saying they respect the academic freedom of the current crop of UC researchers who utilize the Gill Tract, and even inviting these researchers to continue their work alongside them, organizers of the farm occupation have expressed concern with the University of California’s wider links to agribusiness corporations. Perhaps due to these criticisms, a few of the researchers who use the Gill Tract in their experiments have fired back. They said their work, and, by association, UC’s research program at the Gill Tract, isn’t connected to the biotech industry’s profit motives, nor the genetic engineering of food crops.

In an interview with Albany Patch shortly after the occupation began, Damon Lisch, a UC researcher who uses the Gill Tract in his studies, characterized his work as having nothing to do with the agenda of corporate agribusiness. “Basic research using corn as a model is different than making GMO corn to improve profits for Monsanto,” he said. In another Albany Patch article, UC researcher Sarah Hake said her research “is not to create new products (such as in genetic engineering),” but rather, “to understand basic processes in plant biology.” Most recently, Chronicle columnist Chip Johnson quoted UC researcher George Chuck, who is a member of Hake’s lab team, as saying that research at the Gill Tract is not funded by large oil and other corporate concerns.

But are the GMO-free claims of UC’s researchers true? Is research at the Gill Tract by UC’s scientists purely a public service, unconnected to corporate profits?

A survey of biotechnology patents that cite the research of these outspoken scientists shows that some of their research has, in fact, resulted in the production of GMO technologies. While UC’s researchers might not be conducting GMO trials at the Tract directly for Big Agribusiness, some of their findings have been heavily cited by private sector researchers who are developing transgenic crops for their corporate employers. In fact, Lisch, the most outspoken researcher opposed to the Gill Tract occupation, is a co-inventor of a patent that is directly applicable to GMO research.

Lisch is a named inventor of one biotechnology patent owned by UC, “Genetic functions required for gene silencing in maize.” The patent claims to solve a problem, known as “transgene silencing,” faced by developers of GMO corn. In addition, the UC Office of Technology Transfer markets the techniques described in Lisch’s patent to biotechnology companies so they can use these methods in their GMO development operations. According to the UC’s Office of Intellectual Property and Industry Research Alliances website, the patent’s “applications” are relevant to the “genetic engineering of corn.” UC’s Office of Technology Transfer says it’s university policy to keep the names of corporations that are licensing a specific technology confidential, so it’s not clear who is using Lisch’s patented research findings to develop GMO corn.

Researcher Chuck’s insistence that his work at the Gill Tract isn’t funded by industry might be technically true, but his research has also been patented and marketed, not by UC, but by a private biotechnology company called DNA Plant Technology Corporation, which was headquartered on San Pablo Avenue in North Oakland during the 1990s, giving researchers physical access to UC’s resources, including the Plant Gene Expression Center in Albany. DNA Plant Technology’s intellectual property holdings were bought by the Bionova Holding Corporation in the mid-1990s. Bionova markets numerous GMO plant varieties, and has “major technology relationships” with Monsanto and UC, according to the company’s website.

The academic research of UC’s Gill Tract scientists also serves as an important building block in private industry’s biotech efforts. A search of the US Patent and Trademark Office’s online database reveals more than a dozen patents or patent applications that cite Hake’s research. One patent that cites Hake’s corn research involves inserting genetic material from another life form from outside the plant kingdom. The owner of the patent is DeKalb Genetics Corporation, a subsidiary of Monsanto. Lisch’s research is also referenced in patents involving the genetic manipulation of food crops by Pioneer Hi-Bred, a subsidiary of DuPont.

Originally posted here:

Unclean Hands at the Gill Tract?

Public release date: 14-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Sophie Mohin smohin@liebertpub.com Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, May 7, 2012The body’s natural inflammatory response is an essential reaction to injury and infection. When acute inflammation escalates out of control, such as in sepsis, it causes nearly 10% of deaths in the U.S. and more than $17 billion in healthcare costs each year. A group of researchers have developed a groundbreaking biohybrid device that can control acute inflammation to prevent sepsis and other related life-threatening complications, as described in an article in the inaugural issue of Disruptive Science and Technology, a new peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. For a copy of the article “A Biohybrid Device for the Systemic Control of Acute Inflammation,” please contact journalmarketing1@liebertpub.com.

“A device like this has the promise to be the ‘Goldilocks’ of inflammation to be that ‘just right’ modulation of inflammation,” says Yoram Vodovotz, PhD, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh.

This is the first report of a device in essence an auxiliary organ that can reprogram the inflammatory response at the whole-organism level. It represents a foundational concept and design that can accommodate cells genetically modified in an infinite variety of ways and that can be engineered and tailored to meet many different clinical applications.

###

About the Journal

Disruptive Science and Technology, a breakthrough, highly innovative, peer-reviewed journal spearheaded by Editor-in-Chief Alan J. Russell, PhD, Highmark Distinguished Professor, Carnegie Mellon University, cultivates, harnesses, and explores how existing paradigms can be changed to improve human health, well-being, and productivity. The Journal provides a multimedia platform and forum for ideas and opportunities, promotes breakthrough science and engineering, facilitates the innovator-market relationship, and accelerates the transition from bench to society. Bold, transparent, and resistant to limitations driven by protection of the science and engineering status quo, Disruptive Science and Technology provides the first destination for those seeking to publish game-changing results that have the capacity to alter the way we live. For complete journal details, please visit the Disruptive Science and Technology website at http://www.disruptivescience.com.

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Tissue Engineering, Human Gene Therapy and HGT Methods, and Rejuvenation Research. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, newsmagazines, and books is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at http://www.liebertpub.com.

Original post:

Cutting-edge device controls acute inflammation

Public release date: 14-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Sophie Mohin smohin@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, May 14, 2012Disruptive Science and Technology, a new groundbreaking, peer-reviewed journal published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, has officially released its inaugural issue. Spearheaded by Alan J. Russell, PhD, Highmark Distinguished Career Professor, Carnegie Mellon University, the Journal presents new and innovative results and thorough syntheses and analyses focused on front-line concepts that will improve the way we live. Papers in the inaugural issue explore new paradigms in scientific publishing, treatments for sepsis, and temperature regulation, as well as advances in vaccine development, microfluidics, and nanodiamonds. The inaugural issue is free on the Disruptive Science and Technology website at http://www.disruptivescience.com.

“Our main focus is to publish world-class papers that challenge the status quo and bring about new innovations and discoveries that will better our lives,” says Dr. Russell. “Disruptive Science and Technology provides a custom-designed forum for the publication of breakthrough science and engineering that has the capacity to dynamically improve our society.”

Offering original articles accompanied by personal video interviews with authors, the Journal provides an up-close-and-personal view into the extraordinary discoveries presented by developing a direct relationship between reader and author. Readers will become participants in a unique multimedia platform that allows for dialog among a community of top academic scientists, corporate innovators, business leaders, and futurists who provide unique and fascinating views on the science and technology that will shape our future. The Disruptive Science and Technology editorial board is comprised of a group of renowned experts and opinion leaders in innovation, science, health, technology, and business. The complete multidisciplinary editorial board can be viewed on the Journal website at http://www.disruptivescience.com.

###

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Tissue Engineering, Rejuvenation Research, and Human Gene Therapy. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at http://www.liebertpub.com.

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 140 Huguenot St., New Rochelle, NY 10801-5215 Phone: (914) 740-2100 (800) M-LIEBERT Fax: (914) 740-2101 www.liebertpub.com

Read the original post:

New journal on disruptive science and technology launched by Mary Ann Liebert Inc. publishers

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of sections of wild-type (top row) and H1 triple-knockout (bottom row) embryoid bodies. After 14 days in rotary suspension culture, the wild-type embryoid bodies showed more differentiated morphologies with cysts forming (black arrows) and the knockout embryoid bodies failed to form cavities (far right). (Credit: Yuhong Fan)

(Phys.org) — New research findings show that embryonic stem cells unable to fully compact the DNA inside them cannot complete their primary task: differentiation into specific cell types that give rise to the various types of tissues and structures in the body.

Researchers from the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University found that chromatin compaction is required for proper embryonic stem cell differentiation to occur. Chromatin, which is composed of histone proteins and DNA, packages DNA into a smaller volume so that it fits inside a cell.

A study published on May 10, 2012 in the journal PLoS Genetics found that embryonic stem cells lacking several histone H1 subtypes and exhibiting reduced chromatin compaction suffered from impaired differentiation under multiple scenarios and demonstrated inefficiency in silencing genes that must be suppressed to induce differentiation.

While researchers have observed that embryonic stem cells exhibit a relaxed, open chromatin structure and differentiated cells exhibit a compact chromatin structure, our study is the first to show that this compaction is not a mere consequence of the differentiation process but is instead a necessity for differentiation to proceed normally, said Yuhong Fan, an assistant professor in the Georgia Tech School of Biology.

Fan and Todd McDevitt, an associate professor in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University, led the study with assistance from Georgia Tech graduate students Yunzhe Zhang and Kaixiang Cao, research technician Marissa Cooke, and postdoctoral fellow Shiraj Panjwani.

The work was supported by the National Institutes of Healths National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), the National Science Foundation, a Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Scholar Award, and a Johnson & Johnson/Georgia Tech Healthcare Innovation Award.

Enlarge

Phase contrast images showing that H1 triple-knockout (bottom) embryonic stem cells were unable to adequately form neurites and neural networks compared to wild-type embryonic stem cells (top). (Click image for high-resolution version. Credit: Yuhong Fan)

Enlarge

See original here:

Genetic packing: Successful stem cell differentiation requires DNA compaction, study finds

The Southern Action on Genetic Engineering (SAGE)-Karnataka, which undertook a jatha to highlight the threat to farmers’ seeds by corporate seed companies, will conclude its awareness campaign by holding a State-level Seed Savers’ convention in Bangalore on May 20 and 21.

The two-day convention, which will be held at the NGO Hall, Cubbon Park, will hold deliberations on the threat to Karnataka’s seed sovereignty and highlight the State’s seed diversity.

Representative of SAGE-Karnataka V. Gayatri told presspersons here on Friday that efforts have been made by corporate seed companies, particularly foreign companies, to gain control over the agricultural practices of the country. By promoting hybrid seeds, these companies want to destroy traditional and indigenous seeds and make farmers dependent on them.

Chief Minister D.V. Sadananda Gowda will inaugurate the convention on May 20. M.K. Ramesh from National Law School of India University will speak on the emerging legal issues related to seeds.

Originally posted here:

State's seed diversity is under threat, say activists

With some clever genetic engineering but without ever touching a cell or an animal, scientist can remotely control cells using ultrasound, light,and, now, also radio waves. The electromagnetic waves can be used to selectivelyheat up parts of cells and activate a gene to make insulin in mice, according to a recent study published in Science.

But why care about radio waves if we have light and ultrasound?Radio waves have a couple distinct advantages over existing techniques.

In the current study, the radio waves didnt heat up a whole patch of tissue or even a whole cellit only affected specific pores in the cell, calledTRPV1,that open in response to heat. To get this specificity, the scientists made special iron oxide nanoparticles attached to an antibody that only sticks to TRPV1. When they turned on the radio waves, the iron oxide particles warmed up and opened the TRPV1 channel, minimally affecting the rest of the cell or surrounding cells.Ultrasound, on the other hand, heats up a whole patch of tissue to 42 Celsius, which could have damaging or confounding effects on the cells.

Radio waves, unlike light, can also penetrate deep into tissue. To show how the radio could safely work inside an animal, scientists injected mice with special cells that had been genetically engineered to include both the TRPV1 pore and a gene switch that would release insulin when exposed to calcium. Then they got those cells in the mice to start making insulin with a little Rube Goldberg-esque cellular machine: heat from the radio waves opened the TRPV1 channels, calcium rushed into the cells through the open TRPV1, the flood of calcium turned on the insulin gene switch, and, finally, the cells began making insulin. (The whole chain of events makes you appreciate the complexity of biology, right?)

In one last step, the scientists did away with the synthetic iron oxide nanoparticles altogther. They got cells to produce their own iron nanoparticles, a iron storage protein calledferritin. When they tested ferritin in cells, it was 2/3 as effective at inducing insulin production as the synthetic nanoparticles.

There could be medical applications for activating genes in stem cell therapy in the future, but for now, this is just pretty cool: scientists can turn on some radio waves and hack right into the cellular machinery of a mouse.

[via Nature News]

Mouse image via Shutterstock / lculig

Read more:

Now *This* Is a Cell Phone: Using Radio Waves to Control Specific Genes in Mice | 80beats

Public release date: 9-May-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, May 9, 2012Disorders of consciousness such as coma or a vegetative state caused by severe brain injury are poorly understood and their diagnosis has relied mainly on patient responses and measures of brain activity. However, new functional and imaging-based diagnostic tests that measure communication and signaling between different brain regions may provide valuable information about the potential for consciousness in patients unable to communicate. These innovative approaches are described and compared in a Review article in the groundbreaking neuroscience journal Brain Connectivity, a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. The article is available free on the Brain Connectivity website at http://www.liebertpub.com/brain.

Mlanie Boly and coauthors from University of Lige (Belgium), University of Milan (Italy), and University College London (UK) compare the benefits and limitations of three methods for studying the dynamics of brain communication and connectivity in response to internal and external stimulation: functional magnetic resonance imaging f(MRI); transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalograpy (EEG); and response to neuronal perturbation, measuring, for example, sensory evoked potentials (ERP). They report their findings and propose future research directions in the article “Brain Connectivity in Disorders of Consciousness.”

“In recent years, there has been a tremendous interest in gaining a better understanding of the various disorders of consciousness. A variety of methods including fMRI and PET have been used to study these disorders,” says Bharat Biswal, PhD, Co-Editor-in-Chief of Brain Connectivity and Associate Professor, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. “This article provides a comprehensive analysis using three new and innovative methods to study disorders of consciousness.”

###

About the Journal

Brain Connectivity is the journal of record for researchers and clinicians interested in all aspects of brain connectivity. The Journal is under the leadership of Founding and Co-Editors-in-Chief Christopher Pawela, PhD, Assistant Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin, and Bharat Biswal, PhD. It includes original peer-reviewed papers, review articles, point-counterpoint discussions on controversies in the field, and a product/technology review section. To ensure that scientific findings are rapidly disseminated, articles are published Instant Online within 72 hours of acceptance, with fully typeset, fast-track publication within 4 weeks. Tables of content and a sample issue may be viewed on the Brain Connectivity website at http://www.liebertpub.com/brain.

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Tissue Engineering, Human Gene Therapy and HGT Methods, and Rejuvenation Research. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, newsmagazines, and books is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at http://www.liebertpub.com.

See more here:

Can new diagnostic approaches help assess brain function in unconscious, brain-injured patients?

Original post:

Opinions On Genetic Engineering That Aren't Worth A Bean

Autumn-sown sugar beet crops could be included in UK rotations in the future, but only through the development of bolting-resistant varieties using genetic engineering.

A recent British Sugar and Farmers Weekly study tour to Spain visited autumn-sown beet situated in the south of the country, and despite the milder climate being less conducive to bolting, it begs the question: could it work in the UK?

Spain currently grows in excess of 30,000ha of sugar beet, of which about 7,600ha is established in the autumn in the southern region of Andalucia.

“One of the advantages of winter beet in the south is the lower water necessity compared with spring beet, due to the use of winter rains,” says Rodrigo Morillo-Velarde, director at AIMCRA.

“Drilling in the autumn period also ensures that the maximum solar radiation coincides with maximum leaf area index, so the crop has its highest production potential.

“We do have problems with randomness of pests and diseases due to the climatic variations, high competition from weeds that germinate throughout the autumn, winter and spring and also some bolting,” he says.

Despite bolting in the unlikely event of extremely cold weather, it is something that can be controlled by using conventionally-bred varieties with bolting resistance, adds Mr Morillo-Velarde.

It is the use of the water and sunlight during the months of April, May and June with a large canopy that would appeal to UK growers, which would subsequently increase yield potential.

“It would be such a huge genetic move for the UK, as you are moving the drilling period ahead of the vernalisation conditions during the winter, so realistically, it is something that only GM technology could facilitate,” says Patrick Jarvis, best practice agriculture manager with ABSugar.

“What comes with that is all the usual problems associated with genetic engineering, such as government and public opinion. British Sugar would only use the technology if it received the approval from its customers.

Continued here:

You are here

Devangshu Datta: Towards an HIV cure Advances in genetic engineering techniques may finally help us win the battle against this global scourge Devangshu Datta / New Delhi May 04, 2012, 00:53 IST

Since AIDS, or acquired immune deficiency syndrome, was identified in 1981, there has been only one medically-certified cure. That occurred under unusual circumstances and it gave researchers an important clue about new ways to attack the disease. Recent advances in genetic engineering techniques have aided in this process. Some studies offer new hope of a cure for the 35 million estimated to be infected worldwide.

No disease inspires as much superstitious dread. So far, AIDS is estimated to have killed over 30 million people and it infects millions every year. It is especially prevalent in Sub-Saharan Africa.

HIV is transmitted through the exchange of body fluids. Common causes of infection (not necessarily in order) include unprotected sex, blood transfusions, sharing needles and so on. The associations with promiscuity and drug addiction make it hard to implement policies to stop HIV-spread. What works best is a combination of sex education and drug awareness programmes, coupled with easy availability of condoms and disposable needles. But in conservative societies like India, people object to sex education. Some religions also discourage the use of condoms.

Someone infected with HIV (HIV-positive) may survive years, without symptoms. The virus attacks a class of white blood cells called CD4 T-cells. It inserts itself into the cell and replicates. T-cells are part of the natural immune system. Once AIDS develops owing to HIV taking over T-cells, the immune system shuts down. Most AIDS patients die of cancer, pneumonia, or some other infection.

The new approaches involve inserting immune genes into HIV-positive patients, through genetic engineering of stem cells. Every researcher is cautious about claims of cures. The characteristic long symptom-less periods and HIVs ability to hide can be cruelly deceptive. HIV-positive people are also vulnerable to quacks. Many charlatans, including a cross-dresser who teaches yoga on Indian television, have claimed at various times to have found AIDS cures.

Some people have natural genetic immunity for various reasons. Advances in understanding of genomes have helped identify some of the causes of immunity. Researchers have known for a while that a mutated gene called CCR5 Delta 32 offers natural immunity to HIV.

The mutation is rare and found only in a few northern Europeans. The normal CCR5 gene, which most people possess, is the receptor HIV uses to enter T-cells. HIV cannot use the Delta-32 mutated gene and, hence, cannot replicate in a host who has two copies of the CCR5 Delta 32 gene (one inherited from each parent). Even one copy of Delta 32 seems to offer some protection. Only about one per cent of northern Europeans possess both copies.

In 2007, Timothy Ray Brown, an American resident in Berlin, was HIV-positive and also under treatment for leukaemia. Leukaemia causes an abnormal increase in white blood cells and a drop in red cells. Blood cells are produced by bone marrow. One drastic treatment is a bone marrow stem cell transplant from a healthy person. This helps regenerate healthy blood with a good haemoglobin ratio, and a new immune system. Its dangerous since the patients entire immune system must be destroyed prior to the transplant.

Browns doctors at the Charite University Medicine Berlin, Kristina Allers and Gero Hutter, found a compatible donor who belonged to that rare one per cent with the Delta-32 mutation. Five years later, after the transplant procedures, the Berlin Patient, as Brown is called in medical journals, is still HIV-free and doctors concur that this is a functional cure.

More:

Devangshu Datta: Towards an HIV cure

www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE2OFfmrJRI

See the rest here:

Genetic Modification of Foods – Video

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WvJBbBMU4s

Continue reading here:

Joe Rogan Pod cast Ron Paul genetic engineering. – Video

www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrSPYfsx4kQ

See original here:

Genetic Engineering – Video

www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7-ofCWJiUg

Visit link:

Glowing Rats and Extreme Genetic Engineering – Video

Public release date: 24-Apr-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, April 23, 2012 Nearly 8 of 10 Americans will experience lower back pain at some time in their lives. Persistent low back pain is a common, incapacitating, costly, and difficult to treat condition. Many patients might benefit significantly from an individualized, multidisciplinary, team-based model of care that includes access to licensed complementary care practitioners (e.g., chiropractors, massage therapists, and acupuncturists) in addition to conventional care providers, as demonstrated in a study published in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, a peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. The article, “A Model of Integrative Care for Low-Back Pain,” is available free on The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine website at www.liebertpub.com.acm.

David M. Eisenberg, MD, and colleagues from Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA), Group Health Research Institute (Seattle, WA), and Brown University (Providence, RI), compared conventional therapy alonedefined as “usual care”to the combination of an integrated program of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies plus usual care. They report significant differences between the two randomized patient groups in outcomes which included pain, functional status, and difficulty performing routine, self-identified challenging activities.

CAM therapies were provided by a trained team of healthcare practitioners and included acupuncture, chiropractic, massage therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, mind-body techniques, and nutritional counseling. Usual care consisted of treatments provided by subjects’ primary care physicians and typically included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), physical therapy and bed rest as needed, education, and changes in activity levels.

###

About the Journal

The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine is a monthly peer-reviewed journal publishing observational, clinical, and scientific reports and commentary intended to help healthcare professionals and scientists evaluate and integrate therapies into patient care protocols and research strategies. Complete tables of content and a sample issue may be viewed on The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine website at www.liebertpub.com.acm.

About the Company

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Alternative and Complementary Therapies, Medical Acupuncture, and Journal of Medicinal Food. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry’s most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm’s 70 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. website at www.liebertpub.com.

Read more:

CAM therapy combined with conventional medical care may improve treatment of lower back pain

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don’t have an account yet? Create an account

E-Mail or Member ID

Password

Remember Me Log In

Read this article:

George Rathmann, Chief of Amgen, Dies at 84